Search for: "State v. Square"
Results 5901 - 5920
of 6,571
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2023, 7:14 am
However, such prescribing activities would be limited under the new rules to non-narcotic Schedule III-V controlled substances, a limitation not expressly included in the special registration provisions of the Ryan Haight Act. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 8:11 am
As we discussed here, that suit was dismissed on August 20, 2014 in State of Texas v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 12:19 pm
Guidance on “Filing TINs” v. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 1:20 pm
Mott in 1976, held squarely that agency use of resources to support one side in an election (in that case to support passage of a bond measure) violates state law. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:12 am
U.S. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 5:11 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:12 am
U.S. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 1:27 pm
After the Supreme Court decided Citizens United v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm
Since the mid-1970s, he has been deeply pessimistic about the possibilities of political change: Political action of any sort, he believes, cannot improve or ameliorate the condition of black people in the United States. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 7:00 am
Pinsky, Parks Commissioner Adrian Benepe, New York Secretary of State Lorraine Cortés-Vázquez, Metropolitan Waterfront Alliance President and CEO Roland Lewis, and an array of New York City waterfront advocates. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 12:18 pm
American Bush v. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 9:40 am
Despite being a national leader in office to residential conversions, Downtown’s reported office occupancy rate is best described as being in a state of transition. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 9:04 pm
Commenting on Tiananmen Square, Li approves of its crushing, arguing that “the alternatives would have been far worse. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
Van den Heuvel v. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 6:37 pm
Sutton’s opinion, meanwhile, rested on a dubious distinction between as-applied and facial challenges that would have required the Supreme Court to overrule United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 7:40 pm
United States, 322 U.S. 78 (1944). [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 6:03 am
Drukteinis (M.D. and J.D.) discussed the legal issues presented when a consultant refuses the request of the ER doc, at NY Emergency Medicine;Tort "reform" took center state at a Republican presidential debate. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 2:40 am
This was the situation that Albert Holland placed at the doorstep of the Supreme Court in Holland v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 4:12 am
Rather than blindly adhering to formalist procedural concerns, we should instead be guided by the equitable principles that traditionally govern the law of habeas corpus, Munaf v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 6:38 am
The court squarely rejected Wells Fargo’s contention that the estate was required to show “but for” causation and thus summary judgment was warranted in its favor since it showed she was terminated for poor performance. [read post]
