Search for: "In re E.G."
Results 5921 - 5940
of 13,693
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2010, 12:09 pm
Scalia and Thomas are at times somewhat principled on federalism issues (e.g. here), so that might be the way to go. [read post]
4 May 2011, 8:18 am
Here’s the truth: You can settle your own debts: If you’re struggling to keep up with or have fallen behind on some bills, your creditors may be willing to negotiate with you. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 9:06 am
Some environmentalists are not convinced, and argue that too little is known about the effects of this material on crop lands-e.g. what this will material do to the crops, what will be the long term affects on the soil, what will be the affects of humans consuming crops where the waste is spread? [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 9:16 am
How they’re prosecuted is protected in part by the U.S. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 5:22 am
It has been said that the case re-establishes some certainty in this difficult area, but I'm not so sure that it does. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 2:17 am
" "[M]ore evidence would be necessary to show that it has become distinctive of applicant’s goods, e.g., affidavits or declarations from the ultimate purchasers and/or unsolicited publicity and references in the media. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 2:37 pm
Stat. 718.1265(1)(g). [8]E.g., 718.1265(1)(a), (b), (e), (j), (k) & (m). [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 12:59 pm
Evidence gathered in the shuanggui process isn't supposed to be admissible in court; the prosecution is supposed to re-gather the evidence. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 11:23 am
Several high-profile, wonderful attorneys died in the month of March — e.g., Warren Christopher, Bill Stuntz — but we’re not including them in this month’s contest. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 6:59 am
If you run into a question you’re not sure about, put some thought into possible solutions before going to the senior attorney – not “Here’s this problem; what do we do? [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 9:04 pm
To ascertain how the new regulations apply to your business (e.g., whether a certain policy constitutes a noncompete, what notice obligations a business may have in connection with noncompetes previously entered into with non-senior executives, and whether a particular employee can rightfully be considered a “senior executive”), and to otherwise strive to ensure full compliance with the FTC’s new rules, you’re advised to work with competent employment… [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 3:30 am
Financial Reporting: Some preparers noted that their personnel use GenAI in creating initial drafts of internal documents (e.g., summaries of accounting standards and interpretations, presentations, and benchmarking of company information with publicly available information from competitors). [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 3:30 am
If, for example, an employer extends leave to new mothers beyond the period of recuperation from childbirth (e.g. to provide the mothers time to bond with and/or care for the baby), it cannot lawfully fail to provide an equivalent amount of leave to new fathers for the same purpose. [read post]
28 Dec 2006, 1:11 pm
See In re Estate of Smith, 201 Ill. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 4:25 am
See, e.g., 17 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Apr 2008, 11:48 am
The first is that (assuming their businesses are similar), if you're involved with the smaller company, you owe a duty of loyalty to that smaller venture. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 6:15 am
Jonathan Nadler and Joel Barras published a series of three related articles in Forbes magazine last week, in which the Labor & Employment duo presents their thoughts on what employers should expect if Obama wins the election, and if Romney wins the election.Part 1 in the series focused on the effect of Obama’s re-election on independent contractor classification. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 3:20 pm
The Path to Justice in a Court-Based Drug treatment court program: "Research has shown that people who graduate from drug treatment court programs are less likely to re-offend. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 6:42 am
I’ve been talking about joint employer issues for years — it’s just that we’re seeing some more publicity about it now. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 9:49 am
Essentially, Sandberg argues that even before they get pregnant, women planning to have children sometimes start to scale back in the workplace, making various accommodations and sacrifices (e.g., not applying for a new, more demanding leadership position) so that they will have the right structure in place when they do have kids and want to combine work with family. [read post]
