Search for: "Law v. USA" Results 5921 - 5940 of 6,011
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2020, 8:03 am by Schachtman
“The slickest way in the world to lie is to tell the right amount of truth at the right time-and then shut up. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 4:26 pm
It took some convincing on the part of the new Church, and a change in the law by Parliament, before the Archbishops of Canterbury and York could be persuaded to ordain the candidates from America (Bishop Seabury of Connecticut grew tired of waiting, and was ordained in Scotland). [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 10:00 pm by Rechtsanwalt Martin Steiger
Sie ist zum Beispiel Geschäftsführerin der «IT&Law Consulting» GmbH. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 2:02 pm by Jared Beck
(Citizens United itself overruled a 20-year old precedent, Austin v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 5:48 am
Al Arian's lawful support for the Palestinian struggle in the U.S. and the tragic violence connected to Israel's illegal occupation of Palestine. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:26 am
  Testing and evaluations, including post-deployment performance monitoring, will help ensure that AI systems function as intended, are resilient against misuse or dangerous modifications, are ethically developed and operated in a secure manner, and are compliant with applicable Federal laws and policies. [read post]
2 May 2011, 8:12 am by Kara OBrien
Update on Dodd-Frank Investment Adviser Registration Requirements Title IV of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank), which became law on July 21, 2010, repealed effective July 21, 2011, the private advisor exemption from registration as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (Advisers Act). [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
In the event that the Board of Appeal wishes to make a decision detrimental to the Applicant’s [sic] rights at any time, it is hereby requested that Oral Proceedings be held to discuss this matter”.[2.1] It appears from the notice, which complies with all the requirements of R 99(1)(a) and R 41(2)(c), that the appellant is fully identified, the company in question being a real company corresponding to the former owner of the patent in suit incorporated under Canadian law, while… [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Republican Governors Gave Lucrative, No-Bid COVID-19 Deals to Utah Firms, Who Then Gave $1M to GOP Campaigns Yahoo News – Craig Harris, Bailey Schulz, and Katie Wedell (USA Today) | Published: 7/27/2022 A small number of companies leveraged their connections to sign deals to provide COVID-19 tests and personal protective equipment that would pay them at least $219 million in five GOP-led states. [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 8:53 pm by Schachtman
  Under the Federal Rules of Evidence, and most state evidentiary law, Schepers’ prior statements are admissible as they bear on his credibility and the truth of his later, scurrilous writings: “When a hearsay statement … has been admitted in evidence, the declarant’s credibility may be attacked, and then supported, by any evidence that would be admissible for those purposes if the declarant had testified as a witness. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 12:07 am by Thorsten Bausch (Hoffmann Eitle)
Many practitioners, both in Europe and particularly in the USA, prefer drafting patent applications in the loosest and least limiting way possible. [read post]