Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 5921 - 5940
of 13,838
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2023, 5:00 pm
Retirements -- Several Ombuds announced their retirements last year, including:Jim Augustine, University of South CarolinaPaul Kuerbis, Colorado CollegeCraig Mousin, DePaul UniversityMerle Waxman, Yale University (2022) In Memoriam -- Colleagues remembered many Ombuds, including a beloved current and upcoming Ombuds, who passed away in 2023: Mary Childers, retired inaugural Ombuds at Dartmouth CollegeJanet Eckhouse, retired Health Care Ombuds Mediator at Kaiser PermanenteCurtis Grassman, retired… [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 6:47 am
University of Texas at Austin and the arguments in United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 11:57 am
The Petitioners and the States also seek consolidation of their newly filed petitions for judicial review with currently pending chlorpyrifos litigation in LULAC, et al. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 7:49 am
(Kremen and this case applied California law, but the result shouldn't vary much across other states.) [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 3:34 am
United States (2005) - felon firearm possession ban doesn't cover foreign convictionsTennessee v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:51 pm
In United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 1:59 pm
At the end of 1999, the Vermont Supreme Court ruled in Baker v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
Bruen and United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 9:07 pm
Chen of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California examined the principal-agent relationship between the parties to determine what responsibilities each had to the other based on the relationship’s underlying agreements and under California law. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 10:38 pm
Samsung can bring this request again in the United States, but the California-based court doesn't want to interfere with the Japanese court. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 9:34 pm
Meanwhile, Judge Koh has handed down an appealable final judgment in that first California Apple v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 6:29 am
The exclusive jurisdiction provision in the Alberta statute did not divest the district court of its jurisdiction, because only the Constitution and the laws of the United States can dictate what cases or controversies U.S. federal courts may hear. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 9:01 am
That case is captioned United States ex rel. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 2:23 pm
Supreme Court heard oral arguments today in Maryland v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 3:01 pm
In Massachusetts v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 7:17 am
True enough, when we got the judgment for seven (theoretical) figures in Louis Vuitton v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 10:17 am
See United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 11:44 am
According to the United States Supreme Court, the answer is yes. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 9:45 am
McCutcheon v. [read post]
