Search for: "People v. Mays"
Results 5961 - 5980
of 39,685
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2013, 10:45 am
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani, with comments from Eric] Capitol Records, LLC v. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 4:48 pm
Kennedy v. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 10:20 am
In Atlantic v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 5:10 am
In Folkens v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 12:27 pm
This was a requirement, but as of People v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 1:04 pm
As a result, the mental help needed to treat the patient may be foregone and violence may ensue. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
It appears that Georgia attorneys representing injured people may have to give up on direct attacks on the state adoption of Daubert, and do the harder work in each case of beating defense Daubert motions and making offensive use of Daubert against defense expert. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 3:35 am
We may doubt the likelihood of the cure. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 12:06 pm
The article focused on the recent First Circuit decision, Patco Construction Co. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 2:08 pm
However, the People's use of the conjunction "and/or" between each act means that "a jury could just as easily find that defendants committed only one of the alleged acts; not only would a single act not be sufficient to establish a course of conduct but we still would not know on which particular act defendant was convicted. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 10:01 pm
More than 150 people known to be seeking restitution in the case of the USA v. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
SEIU appealed the Supreme Court's ruling.Citing Matter of Taylor v Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 182 AD3d 815 and Matter of Ortiz v Simmons, 67 AD3d 1208, the Appellate Division, noting that one of SEIU's members involved in the instant litigation had retired from the Fire Department, explained "so much of the second amended petition/complaint as was asserted by him is not academic, as the determination that there was… [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
SEIU appealed the Supreme Court's ruling.Citing Matter of Taylor v Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 182 AD3d 815 and Matter of Ortiz v Simmons, 67 AD3d 1208, the Appellate Division, noting that one of SEIU's members involved in the instant litigation had retired from the Fire Department, explained "so much of the second amended petition/complaint as was asserted by him is not academic, as the determination that there was… [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 8:51 am
Doe 1 (formerly Arista v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 11:52 am
Citing RAV v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 6:24 am
There have also been larger observational studies, including Moderna’s ongoing observational trial, the v-safe smartphone app study, and a Harvard SPH-affiliated registry to observe pregnant people in COVID-19 trials. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 4:23 am
Faithless Electors Chiafalo v. [read post]
6 Nov 2021, 5:29 am
Hofmann v. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 10:42 am
Lest that be enough, now there's the hunter exception as well.What's that, you may ask? [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 2:59 pm
Though the criminal trial is now over, the question of civil damages is one that may still need to be addressed. [read post]
