Search for: "People v. Short"
Results 5961 - 5980
of 8,141
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2017, 4:19 pm
Schweitzer v. [read post]
27 May 2016, 6:50 am
(See a list and short description of some of the main programs authorized by the Social Security Act, taking up 6 pages in Adinolfi v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 1:43 pm
In United States v. [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 4:04 am
In short, the judge decided that this late evidence should have been allowed in because:(a) It was accepted that the evidence of use would enable the TITANIC QUARTER word mark to survive in, at least, part. [read post]
1 Jan 2025, 9:01 pm
Johnson (holding that banning homeless people from camping outside did not violate the Eighth Amendment even when they have nowhere else to go), and Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 4:05 am
ItalyCasaPound v. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 1:14 am
Please note the newsletter will be back November 4, after a short break. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 2:30 pm
In Dickinson v. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 7:57 am
Baez v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 5:01 am
From Redacted v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 3:39 pm
Since 7 + 13 = 20, Chapter 20 is used as a short hand. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 7:18 am
In Obergefell v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 1:05 am
V. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 8:45 pm
Nken v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 1:00 am
Data is not available for 2020 and 2021. [11] Section 218 of the Act. [12] Wilkinson v Kitzinger (No 2) [2007] 1 FLR 295, per Sir Mark Potter P at [50]. [13] See paragraph 21(2)(d) of Schedule 5; paragraph 5(2)(d) of Schedule 6; and paragraph 10(3)(a) of Schedule 7. [14] GW v RW (Financial Provision: Departure from Equality) [2003] 2 FLR 108; IX v IY [2018] EWHC 3053 per Williams J at [68]; MB v EB [2019] EWHC 1649. [15] Levin, I. (2004). [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:12 am
Juliana v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 5:09 pm
A snapshot of recent cases, for example, shows that £10,000 can easily be incurred by one party just to get to strike out or summary judgement (see reports on Lait v Evening Standard, Kordowski v Hudson, Robins v Kordowski) – and for some cases this incredibly conservative (Apsion v Butler). [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
In those other cases—chiefly Loving v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:37 am
In Brady v. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 9:30 pm
In Doctor’s Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
