Search for: "State v. Chance" Results 5961 - 5980 of 12,117
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2014, 3:27 pm by Eva Galperin and Parker Higgins
Today, thanks to the unanimous Supreme Court decision in Riley v. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 7:20 am by SHG
A sweet start to the statement of facts in United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 11:32 pm by Nietzer
The higher the level of the governmental official involved, the greater chance his decision is discretionary. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 7:44 am by Ronald Collins
Question:  In what may well be an unprecedented event in Supreme Court history, in his McCutcheon v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 10:30 am by Lyle Denniston
The Virginia case has special symbolic significance, because that is the state that produced the case of Loving v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 4:14 am by Kevin LaCroix
On August 5, 2010, after the state court litigation commenced, a claims representative for the insurer sent counsel for Davis and Maxwell a letter stating that in light of the policy’s Insured v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 10:00 am by Katherine Gallo
  And, it follows logically, that where some of the defense clients are willing to take that chance, it creates opportunities for less willing players to refuse and reap a short term windfall; in the long term, the lack of fairness dooms the process. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 4:05 am by David DePaolo
The tough thing about The Law is that sometimes we don't like it's application to us.Yesterday I whined about New York and what I perceived as opportunistic bureaucratic business wrangling for the sake of governmental revenue enhancement at the expense of small business.Indeed, the piece received a lot of attention in the LinkedIn world where brokers and risk managers basically confirmed that if you're a small business in New York, or doing business in the state, you… [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 7:34 am by David Smith
It also means that cases such as Lower Street Properties v Jones, Church Commissioners v Meya, and MacDonald v Fernandez will become much less relevant in a lot of cases. [read post]