Search for: "State v. Means" Results 5961 - 5980 of 61,304
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2017, 12:52 am
 This means that: "Where the specification does not promise a specific result, no particular level of utility is required; a “mere scintilla” of utility will suffice. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 9:39 am
 This means that: "Where the specification does not promise a specific result, no particular level of utility is required; a “mere scintilla” of utility will suffice. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 8:27 pm
Today, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has overtured a lower court’s decision in Jacobsen v. [read post]
17 May 2014, 3:25 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Endresz v Friedberg held that a stillborn fetus which died from injuries received En ventre sa mere was not a 'decedent' within the meaning of New York's wrongful death statute. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 8:45 am by Gritsforbreakfast
" So it's possible this case may be decided in favor of the state without causing too much damage. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 6:00 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
The five judge Bench's decision of the Supreme Court of India in Cox & Kings v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 8:28 am by Charles Kotuby
The Supreme Court of the United States heard argument in Abbott v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 6:22 am
The Court found Congress's purpose in enacting the NSPA was to `assist the States' efforts to foil the “roving criminal,” whose movement across state lines. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 9:37 am by Eric Goldman
” This all sounds logical in a whiteboard sense, but I have no idea what it means or how to apply it. [read post]