Search for: "United States v. Grant"
Results 5961 - 5980
of 25,375
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2009, 11:01 am
United States, No. 08-497 (cert. petition filed Oct. 15, 2008). [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 8:33 am
[Zaleppa v. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 2:54 am
Sti. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 3:01 pm
Prior to Kimbrough we addressed this issue in United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 2:38 pm
The defense lawyer also blatantly violated that order, stating that the Plaintiff’s current employer, the United States Army, would “take care of its own”. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 8:34 am
In Cohen v. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 10:29 am
Richards v. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 10:29 am
Richards v. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 1:29 pm
Nathan v. [read post]
28 Nov 2024, 5:39 am
Texas v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) in Doe v. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 9:52 pm
Franchisor removed to federal court, and the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, John McBryde, District Judge, 2017 WL 2684055, granted franchisee’s summary judgment motion. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 4:15 am
" Pro-Football, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 5:25 am
United States (here, with Gabriel Lather) and Hickenlooper v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 6:17 am
The recent decision of Seiden v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:35 am
On Monday, June 1, 2015, the United States Supreme Court reversed a judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit which had granted Abercrombie & Fitch (“Abercrombie”) summary judgment in a religious accommodation case brought by a job applicant who wore a headscarf (a hijab) to an interview, but did not mention her religion or request an exception to Abercrombie’s dress code. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 11:45 am
On Monday, June 1, 2015, the United States Supreme Court reversed a judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit which had granted Abercrombie & Fitch (“Abercrombie”) summary judgment in a religious accommodation case brought by a job applicant who wore a headscarf (a hijab) to an interview, but did not mention her religion or request an exception to Abercrombie’s dress code. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 7:17 am
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 7:54 am
Supreme Court ruled in Board of Trustees of Stanford University v. [read post]
