Search for: "Abel v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 99
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2013, 8:49 am by Shahram Miri
This is probably most famously, or infamously depending upon your political persuasion, stated in  the United States Supreme court case Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 9:28 am
Tavera's motion for a new trial based on the Brady failure was still pending when the Sixth Circuit decided, in United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 3:50 am by Susan Brenner
  Gaona–Gomez admitted he was a Mexican national and was in the United States “without the proper immigration documents. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 1:30 pm by Sean Patrick Donlan
It also examines the extent to which policy transfer is evident in the UK and Ireland in terms of emulating the United States in reacting to organised crime. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 12:00 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
The pills were ultimately sold to wholesale prescription drug distribution companies ("corrupt distribution companies"), which then sold them to pharmacies and to other wholesale prescription distribution drug companies across the United States. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 5:31 am
More than twenty-five years ago, the United States Supreme Court adopted the "no evidence" summary judgment procedure under Fed. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
[Update] On 27 January 2012 HHJ Parkes QC gave judgment in the case of Patel v United ([2012] EWHC 92 (QB)), heard on 20 January 2012. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 10:17 am by Jeffrey Kahn
  If she thought your travel was “not in the interest of the United States,” then you stayed home. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 5:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
Family Court Finds Irrebuttable Presumption of Unfitness in SSL 378-a(2)(e)(1) and 378-a(2)(h) Violate Due Process Clauses of the New York State and United States Constitutions In the Matter of the Adoption of Abel,--- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2011 WL 4436127 (N.Y.Fam.Ct.), Cheryl and Derrick Adamson filed a petition to adopt Abel. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 10:40 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The CAFC affirmed ND Ca as to non-eligible matter under 35 USC 101: Plaintiff-appellant CyberSource Corporation (“Cyber- Source”) appeals from a decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]