Search for: "Alan Rozenshtein"
Results 41 - 60
of 377
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2023, 5:01 am
While many scholars contend that the First Amendment protects political speech, even when it leads to violence, others, including Lawfare Senior Editor Alan Rozenshtein and Fordham law professor Jed Shugerman, believe that Trump could still be held criminally liable for inciting the riot. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 10:32 am
Rozenshtein and Jed Handelsman Shugerman University of Minnesota... [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 2:17 pm
Lawfare editors answered your burning questions on national security law issues from the past year, including the Mar-a-Lago investigation, the Secret Service, the state of the U.S. legal system following the Jan. 6 attacks, the failed German coup, and more: Wittes joined hosts Alan Rozenshtein, Jurecic, and Anderson to discuss the major national security news stories starting off the year, including current chaos in the House of Representatives, the Supreme Court’s ruling… [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 6:59 am
January 6, Ambiguously Inciting Speech, and the Overt-Acts Solution Alan Z. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 4:35 pm
Columbia Global Freedom of Expression seeks to contribute to the development of an integrated and progressive jurisprudence and understanding on freedom of expression and information around the world. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 4:08 pm
Anderson, Daniel Byman, Saraphin Dhanani, Quinta Jurecic, Tyler McBrien, Natalie Orpett, Roger Parloff, Stephanie Pell, Molly Reynolds, Alan Rozenshtein, and Benjamin Wittes shared the 2022 edition of The Year That Was, in which they discussed Lawfare’s coverage this year of top national security issues such as climate change, cybersecurity, the Mar-a-Lago investigation, Jan. 6, and more. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
Anderson on developments in foreign relations and international law, Stephanie Pell on cyber issues, Alan Rozenshtein on social media and content moderation, Daniel Byman and J. [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 11:27 am
January 6, Ambiguously Inciting Speech, and the Overt-Acts Solution Alan Z. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 2:04 pm
Anderson, Jurecic, and Rozenshtein were joined by Reynolds to discuss the week’s big national security news. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 2:37 pm
John’s University) and Alan Z. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 2:01 am
To talk through it all, Lawfare executive editor Natalie Orpett sat down for a live event with Lawfare senior editors Quinta Jurecic, Roger Parloff, Molly Reynolds, and Alan Rozenshtein, as well as editor-in-chief Benjamin Wittes. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 2:01 am
Lawfare senior editor Alan Rozenshtein sat down with Chris to discuss his new book, “Virtual Searches: Regulating the Covert World of Technological Policing,” in which Chris explains how the traditional legal framework for surveillance is out of date and what should take its place. [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 7:23 am
Alan Z. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 4:59 pm
Anderson, Jurecic, and Rozenshtein sat down with Orpett to talk through the week’s big national security news. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 7:17 am
Alan Rozenshtein and Jed Shugerman have posted this draft on SSRN (forthcoming, Constitutional Commentary). [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 2:01 am
On this episode of Arbiters of Truth, our series on the online information ecosystem, Lawfare senior editors Alan Rozenshtein and Quinta Jurecic sat down with the conference’s organizers, election law experts Rick Hasen and Nate Persily, to talk about whether Trump should be returned to social media. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 2:01 am
On this episode of Arbiters of Truth, our series on the online information ecosystem, Lawfare senior editors Alan Rozenshtein and Quinta Jurecic sat down with Suzanne Nossel, a member of the Oversight Board and the CEO of PEN America. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 1:25 pm
Alan Z. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 2:01 am
To chew it all over, Lawfare editor-in-chief Benjamin Wittes sat down with Lawfare senior editor and University of Minnesota Law School professor Alan Rozenshtein, who followed the oral arguments and live tweeted them. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
The district court also notably held that the First Amendment did not protect Trump’s rally speech, which has prompted questions about ambiguously inciting speech, a topic Alan Rozenshtein and Jed Shugerman have previously explored on Lawfare. [read post]
