Search for: "Alaska v. Alaska Democratic Party"
Results 41 - 60
of 67
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
The general statement of strict liability in Alaska is that “a manufacturer is strictly liable . [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
Nearly 60 percent of the 110 people who have moved to the Hill from the influence industry since the midterm election went to work for House Democrats, a likely result of the flurry of new jobs available after the party regained control of the chamber. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 12:32 pm
During that time, he would argue another nineteen cases before the Court, including a defense of Alaska’s sex offender registration law against a challenge in Smith v. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
In this circumstance, it is not surprising that leading Democratic politicians, progressive legal scholars, and centrist or center-left groups like Common Cause have portrayed a new convention called under Article V of the 1787 Constitution as an anathema that would destroy what is left of the federal system sustaining the United States. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
The justices faced heightened security risks, Thomas noted, after the leak of the court’s majority opinion to overturn Roe v. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 3:00 am
In a few of the biggest Supreme Court decisions of the last few years – including Dobbs v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
The 2010 SpeechNow v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
Arguably, this was anti-democratic, and certainly it seemed standardless. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am
As a consequence, the appointment of Stevens’ successor by a Democratic President with a Democratic Senate is unlikely to shift the Court’s rulings on most important social issues, such as abortion, affirmative action, religion, and gay rights. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
James Madison had suggested that constitutional protections of rights were, ultimately, only “parchment barriers” against the desires of those with political power, whether democratic majorities or oligarchs, to get their way. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 10:52 am
"] From today's Second Circuit decision in Palin v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 8:05 pm
The case concerned Alaska's law that required convicted sex offenders to register with the state, a requirement that the federal appeals court in San Francisco had struck down as punitive. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
There's a legal doctrine out there called the "municipal cost recovery rule" that prevents governmental bodies from suing over response costs (medical bills, law enforcement, emergency services, that kind of thing) because it's an end run around the democratic process. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 12:29 pm
[Republican Senator] Lisa Murkowski in Alaska lost her primary, and she was opposed by members of the Republican caucus. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s ruling in Bostock v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 6:25 am
It seems practically self-evident to me that having its presidential nominee under indictment would be an utter travesty for the Democratic Party. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Click Here US District Court Decision in US v. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 3:12 am
(IPKat) United States US General 2005 civil damages awards in state courts rarely broke $1M according to report released by US Justice Department (Law360) Changes to expert witness rules draws critisism (Law360) Collaborative law and intellectual property cases (The IP ADR Blog) Democrats victory could mean a new focus on civil suits (Law360) Election could drastically affect appeals court makeup (Law360) Ethics case survey: when is attorney-client privilege waived? [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm
The agreement, lodged in federal court in Boston, resolves federal and state liability claims against 49 potentially responsible parties for the cleanup of the site. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm
The agreement, lodged in federal court in Boston, resolves federal and state liability claims against 49 potentially responsible parties for the cleanup of the site. [read post]
