Search for: "American Trade Partners v. A-1 INTERN. IMPORTING" Results 41 - 60 of 237
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2019, 8:02 pm
(Trump admin to let Americans sue some foreign firms doing business in Cuba).These actions are made possible because of two significant changes. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 6:02 pm by Duncan
(American IPA) US Patents – Decisions Supreme Court re-opens door for patentability of business methods in Bilski v. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 8:06 am
For the Cubans that is a counterweight to both their friends (the Russians and Chinese) and their frenemies (the Americans). [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:37 pm by Xiaomin (Samantha) Hu
But as they strive to achieve their business goals, U.S. companies need to be aware of the potential risk factors and legal dangers in dealing with their Latin American partners. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:58 am
Dickstein Shapiro (Patently-O) ITC: No s 337 violation; investigation terminated in Certain Semiconductor Integration Circuits Using Tungsten Metallization and Products Containing Same involving complainants LSI and Agere (ITC 337 Law Blog) Fleshing out design patent infringement doctrine: Crocs v ITC (Patently-O)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Billingnetwork Patent – Court orders plaintiff to file separate patent suits against each defendant: Billingnetwork… [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
Varian (PATracer)   US Copyright The importance of registering copyright in the United States: Elsevier B.V. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
Varian (PATracer)   US Copyright The importance of registering copyright in the United States: Elsevier B.V. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 6:31 am
(American IPA)     US Patents – Decisions Supreme Court re-opens door for patentability of business methods in Bilski v. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let me know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 2:00 am
(PatLit) PRS CEO departs (1709 Copyright Blog) UK IPO: New trade mark services from 1 October 2009 (Class 46) Are non-binding opinions a useful tool in patent litigation? [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:59 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Joy of producing/consuming can be important motivation for activities, though, so exploring how courts deal with it in IP is important. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 8:48 am
A lesson for brand owners – Dispute over ILLICIT mark (International Law Office)   Nigeria How not to create a new name: Lessons from NiGaz (Afro-IP)   Poland Trade mark issues on a geographical name of gmina (Class 46)   South Africa Independent Communications Authority of SA publishes position paper on whether there is a need to reform laws relating to copyright ownership in commissioned works (Afro-IP) South African authors seek first public… [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 11:42 pm
" [1] One would think that the legal industry would have made giant strides towards remedying such primitive opinions. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:05 pm
…well I sort of half love him – ‘Firms with strong intellectual property strategies fare better in raising capital’(Tangible IP) A quick explanation on prior art (Article One Partners)   Global - Trade Marks / Brands International Trademark Association (INTA) meeting: Boston: Day 1, 2, 3 (IPKat) (IPKat) (IPKat) (IPKat) (IAM) (IP Factor) (Article One Partners) Brands and INTA: going where no annual meeting has gone before? [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 9:00 am
Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let me know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(China Law Blog) Europe ECJ issues preliminary ruling in L’Oreal/Bellure regarding whether imitation perfumes were protected as permissible comparative advertising (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI: Proof of trade mark use: Harwin International LLC v OHIM, Cuadrado SA (IPKat) CFI: Last minute reprieve for passing off: Last Minute Network v OHIM-Last Minute Tour (IPKat) CFI dismisses Korsch’s appeal against refusal to grant CTM for… [read post]