Search for: "Asbestos Products Liability v." Results 41 - 60 of 554
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2020, 9:44 am by Schachtman
”), aff’d sub nom., Juni v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:13 am by Schachtman
Fraud GAF’s claims of frauds discussed[15] earlier focused on the claim that asbestos plaintiffs’ lawyers focused had committed [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am by Schachtman
The relevant Utah statute was interpreted in an asbestos products case, in which the defendants asserted that: “the physician who rendered the diagnoses and the technician who administered the pulmonary function tests did so without the required licenses. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 11:18 am by Schachtman
Daubert itself was a pharmaceutical product liability case, as were Joiner and Kumho Tire. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:35 am by Schachtman
Clients ask whether there are remedies for the promotion of false, fraudulent, or just inadequate medical science under the banner of seeking compensation in products liability cases. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 4:38 am by John Hochfelder
The trial judge reduced the damages to $6,000,000 for pain and suffering and $600,000 for loss of consortium, In Nemeth v. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm by Jeffrey Morris
Between 600,000 and 2.4 million American veterans were believed to have had some exposure to the herbicide, which allegedly caused a variety of illnesses and reproductive problems.Weinstein viewed the litigation over Agent Orange not as a product liability action multiplied many times over, but as a major social problem needing settlement. [read post]