Search for: "Axe v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 138
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2016, 4:05 am by bryannewland
On May 17, 1934, the United States Senate Committee on Indian Affairs debated the terms of the IRA. [read post]
12 Aug 2017, 4:29 am by Benjamin Wittes
" Their findings are rich across a bunch of different axes, but for present purpose, one conclusion is key: "The data Trump cited in his speech to the Joint Session of Congress simply don’t support his claims that a 'vast majority' of individuals on the list came from outside the United States—unless, that is, you include individuals who were forcibly brought to the United States in order to be… [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 4:35 am by Steve Vladeck
As he noted, “The President has not persuasively explained why, if executive privilege did not preclude enforcement of the subpoena issued in [United States v.] [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
City of Riviera Beach, Florida, United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 1:00 pm
I very strongly doubt that any non-Japanese -- the "Asian" referred to in the complaint -- would be drawn from India or China into a rotation into the United States. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 2:20 pm by Shelley Brown
Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court declared state laws establishing separate public schools for black and white students unconstitutional. 2. [read post]
21 Nov 2006, 7:48 pm
Demner, The Nuclear Terrorism Convention: Will Detainees Be Classified as "Enemy Combatants" by the United States Harvard Law Review, Volume 120, Number 1, November 2006 Neal Kumar Katyal, Hamdan v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 9:44 am by Kevin Johnson
Deputy Solicitor General Malcom Stewart began for the United States by “stress[ing] the breadth of Congress’s constitutional authority to establish the rules under which aliens will be allowed to enter and remain in the United States. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 12:14 pm
IMS Health Inc., 131 S.Ct. 2653, 2659 (2011), and United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 9:30 pm by Barry Barnett
 But the maker had has registered the label/mark with the United States Patent and Trademark office. [read post]