Search for: "Bass v. Bass"
Results 41 - 60
of 418
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2014, 6:30 am
Facts: Mother and Father, parents to two daughters, were divorced. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 3:56 pm
Lake Cherokee v. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 7:47 am
Bass, 2008 Tenn. [read post]
14 May 2019, 8:01 am
Gear Inc v Hi-Tech Sports plc [1992] FSR 121, Morritt J stated "…it seems to me that 'reason to believe' must involve the concept of knowledge of facts from which a reasonable man [person] would arrive at the relevant belief. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 5:35 am
Big Bass Lake Community Association v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 4:50 am
Bass, 2012 U.S. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 8:37 am
Lake Cherokee Hard Drive Technologies, LLC v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 3:06 pm
Gene Quinn of IPWatchdog savaged the decision in the postWith dubious logic and inaccurate statements of law, PTAB denies another Kyle Bass IPR petitionThe decision is paper 23 of the case IPR2015-01136 .Bloomberg discussed the reaction of Kyle Bass:“They threw Acorda out on a technicality; they threw Biogen out by ignoring the law,” Bass said. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 7:30 pm
utm_source=Mondaq&utm_medium=syndication&utm_campaign=View-OriginalOn the other side of the coin, one notes that Kyle Bass is seeking an IPR against Shire.Yesterday [1 April 2015], he [Bass] filed challenges against patents for two Shire drugs – the Lialda medicine for ulcerative colitis and the Gattex treatment for short bowel syndrome. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 6:56 pm
See Babbitt v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 12:02 pm
, Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 9:24 pm
Bass, 2011 U.S. [read post]
10 May 2013, 7:57 am
Their argument is based on an unpublished NJ Appellate Division decision, Bass v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 8:05 am
Bass Pro Outdoor World, LLC In EEOC v. [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 6:26 am
Bass, based in Dallas, has already drawn blood. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 12:41 pm
Jones v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 2:13 pm
Lake Cherokee Hard Drive Technologies, L.L.C. v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 10:51 am
Holt and Futter v. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 12:59 pm
Co. v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 5:50 pm
Hence the disqualification order here.But then, around a dozen pages in, I read that the judge actually entered the case the day after a tentative decision was posted against his client -- and, as the Court of Appeal found, the judge's "association and recusal request [an attempt to recuse the judge who posted the tentative] the night before the hearings 'were actions taken by the retired judge in this case intending to disrupt the proceedings in which tentative rulings had issued in… [read post]
