Search for: "Bates v. United States Department of Justice"
Results 41 - 60
of 76
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2018, 3:33 am
Harrison, a cert petition involving the procedures used to serve process in the United States on a foreign nation, on which the court has asked the federal government to weigh in. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 4:24 am
” At National Review, Carrie Severino calls Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:25 am
The biggest story in the world this week was of course the election of Donald Trump as the next President of the United States. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 4:21 pm
Upstream is at issue in EFF’s Jewel v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
[1]United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
As shown below, the California Department of Justice (“DOJ”), which enforces Section 26820, applies the law to ban the display of any picture or physical depiction of a handgun. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
That is what happened in United States v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm
To take just one example, while TCRR cites Alexander Polikoff’s Waiting for Gautreaux for the fact that 65 of the 75 staff attorneys in the Civil Rights Division protested the Justice Department’s change of position in Alexander v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm
To take just one example, while TCRR cites Alexander Polikoff’s Waiting for Gautreaux for the fact that 65 of the 75 staff attorneys in the Civil Rights Division protested the Justice Department’s change of position in Alexander v. [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 9:30 am
The Justice Department, however, entered the case, saying that if Judge Collyer did not dismiss the lawsuit outright, the government would invoke the so-called “state secrets privilege” in a move to block it from going forward. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 2:00 pm
Judge Pauley then describes the oversight of the program: “It is monitored by the Department of Justice, the Intelligence Community, the FISC, and Congress. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am
My goal here is to set out what I believe are the pros and cons, based on my prior personal experience as the senior legal official of the Department of Defense, a federal prosecutor, and as a career litigator. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 7:00 am
Bates has written, “How is it that judicial approval is required when the United States decides to target a U.S. citizen overseas for electronic surveillance, but that, according to [the government], judicial scrutiny is prohibited when the United States decides to target a U.S. citizen overseas for death? [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 8:40 am
He previously served as General Counsel to the National Republican Senatorial Committee, Deputy Counsel to the Republican National Committee, and Counsel in the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Policy, where he worked on national security issues and the nominations of Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito to the U.S. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am
The Law Society said: “The secret justice proposals in the Justice and Security Bill must not become a cloak for a Government to hide its blushes nor be allowed to deny justice to deserving cases“. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 12:19 am
Austin v UK and Von Hannover v Germany (No 2) It is in this context that the cases of Austin v UK and Von Hannover (No 2) are considered, in order to argue that certain of the proposals currently being put forward are echoed in dominant themes within the judgments. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 11:28 am
Yesterday, Judge John Bates of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia granted the government’s motion for summary judgment in the case of Kadi v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 1:52 am
Firstly, a judgment will be issued this Thursday on kettling (Austin and Others v. the United Kingdom; a brief history of the case can be found here) by the Grand Chamber of the ECHR. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 11:15 am
State Bar 19 Cal. 3d 359 (1977) and Bates v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 12:53 am
AXA General Insurance Ltd & Ors v Lord Ad [read post]
