Search for: "CLASS v. NO DEFENDANT LISTED"
Results 41 - 60
of 2,640
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2022, 11:45 am
Author: Jarod Bona When you defend antitrust class actions in federal court like we do, you often see a long list of state antitrust claims brought by what are called indirect purchasers. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 3:11 pm
Moody v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 5:33 am
Eager v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:32 pm
Marquez v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 4:04 am
Williams v. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 11:32 am
On a question of first impression in the Fourth Circuit, McAdams v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 5:01 am
Williams v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 2:28 pm
In Damasco v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 1:04 pm
We don't see many successful applications of preemption with respect to 510k, Class II medical devices since Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 5:51 am
In its recent opinion, Reliable Money Order, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 2:42 pm
Defendant in administrative class action is entitled to discovery from the plaintiff’s social media accounts. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
No commonality due to multiple defendants, multiple state laws, and plaintiff-specific variations. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 1:40 pm
Zyburo v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 5:56 am
McCrary v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 5:00 am
For example, a defendant convicted as a habitual felon of Class D trafficking in marijuana would be sentenced as a Class C felon, almost certainly to a shorter term than the 175 to 222 months listed in the trafficking statutes. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 5:00 am
XE Holding, LLC, in the Top 5 list. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 6:48 am
See Boeynaems v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 8:36 am
Tex. 2003), the court refused to provide class counsel unredacted access to a defendant brokerage's customer lists:[T]he protective order was entered in response to [plaintiff's] request for contact information for all of [defendant's] customers . . . during the class period. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 7:09 am
In Ross v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 7:15 am
–Emoji GmbH v. [read post]