Search for: "CURTIS, INC. v. UNITED STATES" Results 41 - 60 of 108
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2015, 5:24 am
  Unfortunately, the good guys lost the broader express preemption arguments almost twenty years ago in Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 3:38 am by SHG
In so doing, the Court disregards the rule that “[w]e do not grant a certiorari to review evidence and discuss specific facts,” United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:33 am by Kali Borkoski
Neeley v NameMedia Inc, et al (5:09-cv-05151)(11-2558) Is a fully briefed Eighth Circuit appeal that will be ignored by the United States Courts because of being pro se and IFP. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 11:44 am
Smith (NFP) D.C., A.E., J.E., & J.S.E., Alisandra Curtis v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
  For example, in Tele-Pac, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
  For example, in Tele-Pac, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
  For example, in Tele-Pac, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 2:07 pm
Time, Inc., 468 U.S. 641 (1984), this Court struck down a statutory provision that limited photographic reproductions of United States currency, but exempted reproductions “for philatelic, numismatic, educational, historical, or newsworthy purposes to content that was educational or newsworthy. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:10 pm by Law Lady
GARLAND GEORGE CURTIS, Defendant-Appellant. 11th Circuit.Criminal law -- Sentencing -- Unopposed motion for continuance of resentencing hearing pending review in United States Supreme Court of decision of United States Court of Appeals which obligates trial court to impose 30-year sentence rather than 17-and-a-half-year sentence initially imposed for offense of production of child pornography for transportation into this country -- Motion granted --… [read post]
16 May 2016, 5:57 am by Lee E. Berlik
Why this isn’t the standard in other states is a mystery, because its origins lie in the seminal United States Supreme Court case of Gertz v. [read post]