Search for: "Cato v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 1,217
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2021, 3:26 pm by Josh Blackman
[This article for the Cato Supreme Court Review—my fourth—considers the legal arguments that California v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 4:57 am by Walter Olson
My new Cato post applauds the Supreme Court for its 8-1 decision yesterday in Bristol-Myers Squibb v. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 7:12 am by Walter Olson
Cato files an amicus brief backing a Richland, Wash. florist’s right not to say it with flowers [Ilya Shapiro and Jayme Weber, brief in State of Washington v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 7:20 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
United States (Cato Supreme Court Review, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:02 pm
Cato@Liberty: A Response to Orin Kerr on GPS Tracking by Julian Sanchez: Orin Kerr—easily one of our most lucid thinkers when it comes to applying the Fourth Amendment to new technologies—argues at Volokh Conspiracy that, while it’s a hard call whether the installation of a GPS tracking device to a vehicle counts as a Fourth Amendment “search” or “seizure,” the Supreme Court should not treat the use of such devices as a search when it decides… [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 8:38 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
United States: Bargained Justice and a System of Efficiencies (Cato Supreme Court Review (2018)) on SSRN. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 7:11 am by Kali Borkoski
United States ,” which will lead you to all the posts. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 9:17 am by Rick Hills
(Note that, to my knowledge, the Cato Institute filed no amicus brief in Kansas v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 6:02 pm by Sex Crimes
Ilya Shapiro (of the Cato Institute) has an interesting post discussing the upcoming Supreme Court argument in United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 3:03 am by Walter Olson
Case over harsh IRS handling of lost-in-mail filing reflects worst practices on judicial deference [William Yeatman, Yale Journal on Regulation on Cato certiorari amicus brief in Baldwin v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 5:34 am by Walter Olson
More on Ninth Circuit decision advancing Dukes v. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 3:02 am by Walter Olson
“The Supreme Court should…reaffirm that the Constitution’s prohibition against ex post facto lawmaking forbids states from skirting constitutional scrutiny by simply labeling penalties as ‘civil'” [Ilya Shapiro and Nathan Harvey on Cato certiorari brief in Bethea v. [read post]