Search for: "Clayton v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,100
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
United States, United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 12:48 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Bostock v. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 11:25 am
I’ll avoid starting with the history of antitrust law in general because I think the right place to start here is we have a law in the United States, the Clayton Act, that specifically regulates mergers. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 9:50 am
”[6] Partial Ownership and Section 7 Nothing in section 7 of the Clayton Act limits antitrust scrutiny to transactions of controlling interests. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 3:45 am
The Supreme Court in Bostock v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 11:31 am
In 2020, the Supreme Court ruled in Bostock v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
In 1972, the per se flood crested in U.S. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 7:16 pm
Contents include: Special Feature: Ceasefire in Civil Wars Govinda Clayton, Håvard Mokleiv Nygård, Siri Aas Rustad, & Håvard Strand, Ceasefires in Civil Conflict: A Research Agenda Govinda Clayton, Håvard Mokleiv Nygård, Siri A. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 4:34 pm
From Westenbroek v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s decision in Royal Brush Manufacturing v. [read post]
19 Aug 2023, 8:17 am
" Saxe v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 11:50 am
An example is Ramos v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 6:36 am
In 1971, the court ruled in Griggs v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:59 pm
The United States proposed a broad product market including all shoes. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
Stated in the form of 13 individual guidelines for assessing M&A activity, the draft document reads like an outline of every way the FTC and DOJ might challenge a deal as meeting the Clayton Act’s prohibition: a transaction where the effect “may be substantially to lessen competition, or to tend to create a monopoly. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 9:20 am
Clayton County. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Clayton County. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 1:22 pm
Here the District Court–– citing the well-known AT&T acquisition of TimeWarner in 2018 (See United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 12:30 pm
District court: No Clayton Act violation. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm
Biden v. [read post]
