Search for: "Clemente v Ide" Results 41 - 60 of 87
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Dec 2012, 7:32 am by Kurt T. Koehler
  Traditionally Clement Park Moore is credited with writing the poem, but others attribute it to MAJ. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 9:41 am by Gmlevine
Clement Stein, D2005-1201 (WIPO January 31, 2006) (Pending action in California state court) were dismissed at the Respondents’ requests. “No purpose is served by our rendering a decision on the merits to transfer the domain name, or have it remain, when as here, a decision regarding the domain name will have no practical consequence.” AmeriPlan Corp. id., v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 9:41 am by Gmlevine
Clement Stein, D2005-1201 (WIPO January 31, 2006) (Pending action in California state court) were dismissed at the Respondents’ requests. “No purpose is served by our rendering a decision on the merits to transfer the domain name, or have it remain, when as here, a decision regarding the domain name will have no practical consequence.” AmeriPlan Corp. id., v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 9:41 am by Gmlevine
Clement Stein, D2005-1201 (WIPO January 31, 2006) (Pending action in California state court) were dismissed at the Respondents’ requests. “No purpose is served by our rendering a decision on the merits to transfer the domain name, or have it remain, when as here, a decision regarding the domain name will have no practical consequence.” AmeriPlan Corp. id., v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:07 am by Marty Lederman
As Justice Kagan pressed Paul Clement, "it seems as though you're just talking about a matter of timing . . . . [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 3:15 pm by Rick Hasen
  That’s why South Carolina already hired big gun Paul Clement to work on this case. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 9:21 am by John Elwood
The opinion notes the Federal Circuit’s unwavering support of that conclusion (see slip op. at 3, 17) and even quotes approvingly and at length from a Federal Circuit opinion (id. at 17)—the first time the Court has done that (I think; correct me if I’m wrong) since Warner-Jenkinson v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 11:22 pm
Container, Inc. v. [read post]