Search for: "Condon v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 845
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2010, 4:30 am
People v. [read post]
14 May 2007, 1:09 am
Indeed, as shown below, often a us-v. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 5:28 am
Guevarra v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 10:43 am
The case is State v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 9:20 am
In Bradacs v. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 11:52 am
Marion County OFC (this was a 4/27/07 NFP involuntary termination, affirmed) State v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
Rather, according to the court in Tyrell v. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 8:10 am
The Appellate Division sustained the dismissal on the ground of sovereign immunity and lack of subject matter jurisdiction, citing Jattan v Queens Coll. of City Univ. of N.Y., 64 AD3d 540. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 8:10 am
The Appellate Division sustained the dismissal on the ground of sovereign immunity and lack of subject matter jurisdiction, citing Jattan v Queens Coll. of City Univ. of N.Y., 64 AD3d 540. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 8:10 am
The Appellate Division sustained the dismissal on the ground of sovereign immunity and lack of subject matter jurisdiction, citing Jattan v Queens Coll. of City Univ. of N.Y., 64 AD3d 540. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 8:10 am
The Appellate Division sustained the dismissal on the ground of sovereign immunity and lack of subject matter jurisdiction, citing Jattan v Queens Coll. of City Univ. of N.Y., 64 AD3d 540. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 8:57 am
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)A three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit this week affirmed a lower court's dismissal of a motion to dismiss a class-action invasion of privacy suit brought against San Francisco-based Google, Inc., concerning Street View.In its 35-page decision in Joffe, et al. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 7:44 am
The answer is no.The case is Palma v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 5:05 am
" Citing Matter of Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 32 NY3d 1044, the Appellate Division explained that "[T]he substantial evidence standard is a minimal standard" that is "less than a preponderance of the evidence, and demands only that a given inference is reasonable and plausible, not necessarily the most probable. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 5:05 am
" Citing Matter of Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 32 NY3d 1044, the Appellate Division explained that "[T]he substantial evidence standard is a minimal standard" that is "less than a preponderance of the evidence, and demands only that a given inference is reasonable and plausible, not necessarily the most probable. [read post]
5 May 2007, 4:49 pm
Subsequent to the trial court's response to the jury note, the State filed a motion to reconsider. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 8:34 am
In the alternative, the claimant sought condonation for late notice. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 8:00 am
Condon, and Burnet v. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 9:13 am
Condon, and Burnet v. [read post]
