Search for: "DOE V. GARLAND"
Results 41 - 60
of 670
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2024, 7:16 am
Here.UPDATE: "We have the third and final ruling of the day, in Garland v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 8:29 pm
[Will Garland v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:53 am
The detainee’s counsel clearly wants the court to scrutinize the district court’s 60(b)(2) ruling, and Chief Judge Garland saves her the trouble of finishing her argument: why does this new evidence cast doubt on No-Name’s testimony, exactly, he wants to know? [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 12:09 pm
In any event, that something's a purported tenet of your religion does not necessarily mean that one actively practices it; for example, saying that all Catholics "abstain from premarital sex and don't use birth control" is fairly wildly inaccurate, at least in my experiences.It's not unusual to see a judge's worldview reflected in his or her opinions. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 7:36 am
In Branzburg v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 4:48 pm
Garland v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 5:03 am
Meyers essentially argues that invited error does not turn an undeveloped record into a developed one. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 8:09 am
Dai and Garland v. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 1:54 pm
Posos-Sanchez is a citizen of Mexico, but has resided in the United States since 1980.As today's opinion explains, "in either 2010 or 2011, Immigration and Customs Enforcement removed Posos to Mexico (the record does not explain how or why this removal came about). [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 1:47 pm
(Nor does the majority of the panel.) [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 9:11 am
Someone in Grand Prairie, Dallas, Arlington, Fort Worth, Garland, Mansfield, Crowley, Benbrook, Cleburne, or anywhere else in Texas may ask what does that means. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 9:12 pm
O.L.C. __, at *6 (citing Whitman v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 1:11 pm
Furthermore, the law does not leave open adequate alternative channels for communication, as it significantly prevents TikTok from reaching its audience. [read post]
7 May 2024, 1:11 pm
Furthermore, the law does not leave open adequate alternative channels for communication, as it significantly prevents TikTok from reaching its audience. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 12:43 pm
For example, from footnote 11:"The dissent claims the majority does not “dispute that the vast majority of the agency’s credibility findings” are not supported by sufficient evidence. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 1:23 pm
In Ceridian Corp v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 6:28 am
This is explained in a 1998, Houston Court of Appeals [14th Dist.] case styled, Williamson v. [read post]
5 Dec 2024, 12:15 am
Garland, 2024 WL 4953814 (Dec. 03, 2024). [read post]
3 Nov 2024, 7:13 am
In Lee v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 10:19 am
Arteaga-Martinez was unanimous, with only Justice Breyer dissenting in part, while Garland v. [read post]
