Search for: "Doyle v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 520
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2022, 4:11 pm
From Doyle v. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 9:47 am
United States. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 7:57 am
For the agreement:https://www.eff.org/document/lagleva-v-doyle-settlment-agreement For more on this case:https://www.eff.org/cases/lagleva-v-marin Contact: press@aclunc.org [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 6:45 am
" Vinluan v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:29 am
In Tradesman Program Managers, LLC v Doyle, decided earlier this month by the Appellate Division, First Department, the court affirmed a decision by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Andrea Masley rejecting the tax estoppel argument made by the putative holder (JCB) of an 18.75% membership interest in an LLC. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 4:00 am
Making a U-Turn Back to State CourtIn the case of Blizman v. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 10:22 am
Proof that the plaintiff has submitted "enough facts to enable [the] court to determine that a viable" cause of action exists (Woodson v Mendon Leasing Corp., 100 NY2d at 71; see Gray v Doyle, 170 AD3d at 971) may be established by an affidavit of a party or someone with knowledge, authenticated documentary proof, or by complaint verified by the plaintiff that sufficiently details the facts and the basis for the defendant's liability (see CPLR 105[u];… [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 10:11 am
Related Cases: Lagleva v. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 10:09 am
For the complaint:https://www.eff.org/document/lagleva-v-marin-county-sheriff For more on ALPRs:https://www.eff.org/pages/automated-license-plate-readers-alpr Contact: press@aclunc.org [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 4:54 am
Tradesman Program Managers LLC v Doyle, 2020 NY Slip Op 32452[U] [Sup Ct, Kings County 2020]; Barrison v D’Amato & Lynch, LLP, 2019 NY Slip Op 30905[U] [Sup Ct, NY County]; Lentini v 219 W. 20th St. [read post]
11 Sep 2021, 6:07 am
“[T]he physician-patient privilege does not apply to an examination by a court-appointed physician” Doyle v. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 6:02 am
” (quoting Doyle v. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" 4 NYCRR, in general, applies to employees of the State in the Classified Service[2]and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" 4 NYCRR, in general, applies to employees of the State in the Classified Service[2]and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" 4 NYCRR, in general, applies to employees of the State in the Classified Service[2]and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" 4 NYCRR, in general, applies to employees of the State in the Classified Service[2]and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 4:15 am
In Doyle v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 4:03 am
New York continues to buck the nationwide trend toward harmonization of close corporation and LLC law governing judicial dissolution, as made clear in cases such as Doyle v Icon and Barone v Sowers explicitly holding that New York’s LLC Law § 702 neither mentions nor otherwise accommodates oppression as a basis for seeking judicial dissolution. [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 4:40 pm
United States Twitter said that the National Archives will not be allowed to resurrect Donald Trump’s tweets, even in its official capacity as a record-keeping organization. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 4:10 am
In John Doe 122 v. [read post]
