Search for: "Dyson v. Smith"
Results 41 - 60
of 60
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2011, 11:27 am
R v Smith, heard 16 June 2011. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:19 am
R v Smith, heard 16 June 2011. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 12:59 pm
In Courtroom 2, on Thursday 16 June 2011, the case of R v Smith will be heard by Lords Phillips, Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Collins and Lord Wilson. [read post]
30 May 2011, 11:37 pm
Lady Hale and Lords Kerr, Dyson and Brown also agreed that the inquest into the McCaughey and Grew deaths was required by the HRA, interpreted in the light of Silih, to be Article 2 compliant, the latter pointing out ([102]) that “[t]here are, we were told, 16 existing “legacy inquests” (involving 26 deaths) currently outstanding on the coroner’s books, a further six incidents (involving eight pre-2000 deaths) referred by the Attorney General to the Coroner for… [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:40 am
On 9 March 2011, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the joint appeal of Sienkiewicz v Grief (UK) Ltd; Knowsley MBC v Willmore [2011] UKSC 10. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
Brown v. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 5:30 pm
Spiller v Joseph heard 26 and 27 July 2010 (Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson). [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 5:53 pm
The Press Gazette reports that Lady Justice Smith granted the applicant permission to appeal. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 5:18 am
The Court of Appeal (Sedley, Smith LLJ) had, in a single judgment of the Court [...] [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 5:36 pm
Next Week in the Courts On 21 September 2010 Thorpe and Smith LJJ will hear a renewed oral hearing for permission to appeal [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 10:04 am
The case will be heard by a 5 judge bench consisting of Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 11:00 pm
R (Humberstone) v Legal Services Commission [2010] EWHC 760 (Admin) – Read case Part 2 of Matthew Hill’s feature on the duty to investigate deaths under human rights law (read Part I). [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 4:11 am
Lord Rodger and Sir John Dyson SCJ delivered concurring judgments. [read post]
1 May 2010, 7:52 am
The Supreme Court has, belatedly, posted the “Case Details” for this case, which show that the proposed bench for the hearing is Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown, with Sir John Dyson as the fifth member of the court. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am
That really foreshadows the real issue which is that it's beyond Wednesbury but less than proportionality, and we know that some judges have said that you can't really pass a sliver of paper between Wednesbury and proportionality, which leads to … Width of Gateway (b) ([62]-[67]) This section begins with a citation from Dyson LJ's judgment in Smith v Evans [aka Buckland] [2007] EWCA Civ 1318, at [44], that "It will only be in a truly exceptional… [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am
That really foreshadows the real issue which is that it's beyond Wednesbury but less than proportionality, and we know that some judges have said that you can't really pass a sliver of paper between Wednesbury and proportionality, which leads to … Width of Gateway (b) ([62]-[67]) This section begins with a citation from Dyson LJ's judgment in Smith v Evans [aka Buckland] [2007] EWCA Civ 1318, at [44], that "It will only be in a truly exceptional… [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 4:33 pm
Smith v Evans (or Smith v Buckland) had found that ‘the public law defence is based on conventional public law grounds, that is to say that the decision to recover possession was so unreasonable that no reasonable public authority could have made it’ (Dyson LJ at para 40). [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
- Amsterdam Court of Appeal rules in favour of Hachette Filipacchi Press, publisher of Elle magazine, in trade name/trade mark infringement litigation brought by clothing company WE Netherlands (Class 46) Poland District Administrative Court in Warsaw: ALDO S and ALDI not similar (Class 46) South Africa More on the Springbok emblem (Afro-IP) Sweden Appeal Court rules on reproduction of album cover artwork in case against Åhléns (International… [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
Upjohn Co., 778 A.2d 829, 836-37 (Conn. 2001).District of Columbia: Dyson v. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 12:44 pm
In the only judgment, Lord Justice Dyson rejects the need for an explicit reference to s.71(1), or required form of words, instead following R (on the application of Lisa Smith) v South Norfolk Council [2006] EWHC 2772 (Admin). [read post]
