Search for: "ENGLAND v. STATE" Results 41 - 60 of 3,642
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2014, 2:48 am by Emma Cross
  [1] R (Barclay) v Secretary of State for Justice & Ors [2009] UKSC 9 [2] R (Barclay & Anor) v Secretary of State for Justice and Lord Chancellor, The Committee for the Affairs of Jersey and Guernsey and Her Ma [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 3:53 pm
Approval of drugs by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) should not preempt any liability under state tort laws for pharmaceutical manufacturers, editors of the New England Journal of Medicine argue in a brief to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 2:02 pm
The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) has filed an amicus brief for the plaintiff opposing FDA preemption of state laws that provide a cause of action for inadequate warnings on drugs. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 10:05 am
CAAF has granted review in United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 1:49 pm
On Blog 702, James England writes that the Colorado Supreme Court has confused Daubert jurisprudence in that state with its opinion this week.... [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 12:47 am
Here's a little curio, courtesy of the LexisNexis Butterworths Update service: it's Pocket Kings Ltd v Safenames Ltd and another [2009] EWHC 2529 (Ch), a 16 October 2009 decision of Michael Furness QC, sitting as a deputy judge of the High Court, England and Wales. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:59 am by sally
NML Capital Ltd v Republic of Argentina [2011] UKSC 31; [2011] WLR (D) 220 “The Republic of Argentina was not entitled, by virtue of section 31 of the Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982, to state immunity in respect of proceedings brought in England for the enforcement of a judgment obtained in New York. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:40 am by KIRSTEN SJØVOLL, MATRIX
Background The appeal considered whether the Secretary of State’s failure to exercise his power to require that abortion services be provided through the NHS in England – to women ordinarily resident in Northern Ireland – was unlawful. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 9:11 am by Andres Guadamuz
While most of the attention regarding artificial intelligence and copyright has been centred in the United States, it’s useful to remember that one of the main pieces of litigation is taking place in the courts of England and Wales. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 5:56 pm by INFORRM
The decision handed down last week by the United States Supreme Court in United States v Stevens shows the radically different approach taken in the United States in relation questions of “extreme” and “offensive” freedom of expression. [read post]