Search for: "Elkins v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 120
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2016, 6:19 am by John Elwood
Ohio 16-5580 Issue: (1) Whether the first attempt to execute the petitioner was cruel and unusual under the Eighth and 14th Amendments to the United States Constitution and if so, whether the appropriate remedy is to bar any further execution attempt on the petitioner; (2) whether a second attempt to execute the petitioner will be a cruel and unusual punishment and a denial of due process in violation of the Eighth and 14th Amendments to the United States… [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 2:32 pm by John Elwood
United States overruled United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 1:44 pm by Amy Howe
United States read like a “true crime” novel, involving robberies of drug dealers in the Midwest. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 7:16 am by Kate Howard
United States overruled United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 11:28 am by John Elwood
United States 15-9260 Issues: (1) Whether the trial evidence was sufficient to establish that the petitioner’s robbery of a dealer of illegal drugs “in any way or degree * * * affect[ed] commerce,” in violation of the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 7:43 am by John Elwood
Of last week’s 16 relists, the court dumped nearly half, including United States Forest Service v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 1:18 pm by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 6:36 am by Rory Little
However, between its decisions in Ashe and Yeager, the court ruled in United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 4:46 am by Edith Roberts
United States, an insider trading case. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 12:22 pm by Rory Little
The court has long recognized (in United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 10:20 am by Andrew Hamm
United States ex rel. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 7:02 am by scottgaille
Upon his criminal conviction, the United States expected to seize whatever was left of his wealth. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 7:02 am by scottgaille
Upon his criminal conviction, the United States expected to seize whatever was left of his wealth. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 7:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
State limits choices of individuals to protect them from consequences of their own decisions. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:05 am by John Elwood
United States, 13-10639, asking whether the Eleventh Circuit’s appellate procedural default rule – prohibiting consideration of issues not raised in an appellant’s opening brief – conflicts with retroactivity rules when new precedent changes the law after briefing. [read post]