Search for: "Florian v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 178
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2021, 12:39 am
On Monday, Apple filed the following notice of dismissal with the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (this post continues below the document):21-06-21 Apple Notice of Di... by Florian MuellerThe actual notice is so short--just two paragraphs--that I'll also provide it here:"Plaintiff Apple Inc., pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), hereby gives notice that it (1) dismisses from this action with prejudice… [read post]
30 Nov 2019, 8:55 am
As the great Rush Limbaugh said a few years ago:"George Soros' objective is to agitate and vibrate the United States into a crumbling state of disrepair. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 8:08 am
Apple ... by Florian MuellerThese are the patents-in-suit:U.S. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 10:33 pm
Robart of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington has certified a partial final judgment (this post continues below the document): 13-11-12 Microsoft v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 6:50 am
Yesterday I reported on a courtroom insanity of potentially pathological proportions in Munich (Nokia v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 12:09 pm
The former Chief Judge of the United States Corut of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Randall R. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 12:33 pm
The latter is an issue that two automotive industry bodies have raised in a filing with the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.For a list of previous posts on amicus curiae briefs in FTC v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 8:10 am
, Hans Martien Th.D. ten Napel and Florian H.K. [read post]
3 Mar 2018, 9:54 am
Microsoft v. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 12:56 am
With respect to design patent damages in Apple v. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 2:56 am
And it may just hope that judges or the decision-makers in competition authorities could be gaslighted when a topic is technical and uneasiness may just be enough to let Apple sustain a harmful monopoly in app distribution.Come May, Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California will hear what Apple has been telling antitrust authorities around the globe for a while. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 10:11 pm
Ford and Acer v. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 9:59 pm
True Chemical (or just Performance Chemical v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 9:34 pm
Meanwhile, Judge Koh has handed down an appealable final judgment in that first California Apple v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 6:51 am
Microsoft Patent Infringement Complaint by Florian MuellerThis is not the first time Corel enforces patents. [read post]
2 Jan 2021, 2:21 am
In my two previous posts today, I published and discussed Samsung's opposition to Ericsson's motion for a preliminary injunction and the accompanying sworn declaration by the former Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Professor Randall R. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 11:42 pm
Gilstrap of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas has entered an order that resolves multiple motions brought by Apple and Ericsson. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 7:32 am
Ten days ago, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit granted summary affirmance (i.e., summary judgment at the appellate stage) of Judge Koh's decision to let Apple collect $450 million from Samsung (against a bond posted years ago) even though one of the patents underlying the related ruling had been held invalid by an in-house court (PTAB) of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 3:33 am
In the United States, Nokia won a preliminary ruling at the ITC over two patents, and the result could be a U.S. import ban against HTC's Android-based devices. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 2:57 pm
For the factual background of this Apple v. [read post]
