Search for: "Government Employees v. Windsor" Results 41 - 60 of 117
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2015, 9:30 pm by Karen Wiswall
In its 2013 decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 10:28 am by Jonathan I. Nirenberg
Windsor, the federal government did not recognize same sex marriages. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 4:52 pm by Arizona Employment Law Letter
The same constitutional principle of equal protection applied to same-sex couples in Latta applies with equal force to public employees in government workplaces. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 7:55 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
Tibble v Edison, now up before the Supreme Court, and the history of excessive fee class action litigation presents a nice way of looking at this phenomenon. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 9:48 am by Suzanne Goldberg
In addition, governments and businesses now know that their constituents and employees will continue to suffer under the nation’s patchwork approach to marriage rights for the foreseeable future. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 9:00 am by Holland & Hart
  Place of Celebration to Govern  Under the current FMLA regulations, the definition of spouse is based on the state where the employee resides, not on the state where the employee was married. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 4:11 pm by Doorey
 That much was made clear in the Supreme Court of Canada decision Caimaw v. [read post]