Search for: "Harris v. Commonwealth"
Results 41 - 60
of 106
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2017, 7:00 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 7:00 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 7:24 am
Additionally, the plaintiffs argue the soda tax violates the Commonwealth Constitution’s uniformity clause since similar beverages may be taxed differently. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 11:34 am
Harris v. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm
Events 4 April 2017, “The Commonwealth and Challenges to Media Freedom” conference at the Institute of Commonwealth Studies 28 April 2017, “Conference on Freedom of Expression Online,” Nicosia, Filoxenia Conference Centre, Cyprus Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In the case of Mohareb v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Limited [2017] NSWSC 288 McCallum J had to consider a series of pleaded imputations including “The plaintiff is… [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 5:50 am
Estas vías de indagación tienen el potencial de nutrir una teoría analítica, una teoría normativa, una teoría de interpretación y una teoría social del silencio en el derecho. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 7:05 am
See Dillon v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 2:15 pm
The case was tried before Philadelphia Judge Lisette Shirdan-Harris and a jury. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 1:27 pm
In a recent board decision, Harris v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
Team Members: Zach Benoit (2L), Malini Dhanraj (2L), Sam Nath (3L) The competition involved a case of Commonwealth of Virginia v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 10:39 am
” Match-fixing Scandals Cricket (Harris & Ewing, 1920 or 1921). [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 9:29 am
See Harris v. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2015) Professor James Stewart, of the Faculty of Law at the University of British Columbia, has produced a valuable on line symposium: Business and Human Rights: Next Steps. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 5:05 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 7:41 pm
The Harris Court cited, with approval, a 2002 traumatic cancer case, State ex rel. [read post]
25 May 2014, 10:36 am
LEXIS 69909 (D UT, May 20, 2014), a Utah federal district court dismissed damage claims by an inmate who was an adherent of Asatru who was not permitted to possess rune tiles made of wood or conduct Blot ceremonies.In Harris v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
This anxiety about a representative – or reflective – judiciary was captured most vividly in the Supreme Court’s decision in R.D.S. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 9:52 am
In Enriquez v. [read post]
