Search for: "Hicks v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 457
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2010, 9:00 pm
Hicks v. [read post]
20 Apr 2006, 10:04 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] EWHC 2818 (Admin) (High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court, before Collins J), Secretary of State for the Home Department v. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 8:30 am
State v. [read post]
7 Jan 2007, 1:00 am
Click here for the whole case, Hicks v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 12:00 pm
In State v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 10:20 am
To remind – art 5 states as follows: 1. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 10:27 am
But in White v. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 2:53 pm
" Accord State v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 2:02 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Hicks v R [2009] EWCA Crim 733 (21 April 2009) High Court (Chancery Division) Cobbetts LLP & Anor v Hodge [2009] EWHC 786 (Ch) (22 April 2009) High Court (Administrative Court) Colney Heath Parish Council v Secretary of State for Communities & Local Government & Ors [2009] EWHC 787 (Admin) (22 April 2009) [...] [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 2:50 am
Hicks, because the court of appeals opinions, including the Eighth Circuit opinion in Smith v. [read post]
9 Dec 2006, 5:14 am
Holland II won in State v. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 10:07 am
Jan 11, 2007) (available here), resolved an interesting little issue concerning Booker's reach:In this appeal, we consider whether United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 2:35 pm
By Dennis Crouch Rates Technology and James Hicks v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 5:06 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 9:12 am
In determining whether the trial evidence was sufficient to warrant a charge on the “unknown” theories, the [Appellate] Court relied on the rule stated in Hicks v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 4:23 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 10:22 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 11:23 am
§ 950v(b)(25) (2006), and the sentence based on Al Bahlul v. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 3:16 pm
United States applies on tribal land, as this Court suggested in Nevada v. [read post]
