Search for: "Hooks v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,553
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2024, 3:00 pm
Readers of the blog may I recall that I was counsel of record for the NRA in the Supreme Court stage of NRA v. [read post]
25 Nov 2024, 6:32 pm
Ltd v. [read post]
18 Nov 2024, 6:53 am
District Judge Linda V. [read post]
17 Nov 2024, 9:01 pm
”[8] CFTC implementing regulation, Regulation 40.11, correspondingly prohibits DCMs from listing any event contract that “involves, relates to, or references terrorism, assassination, war, gaming, or an activity that is unlawful under State or Federal law,” or “an activity that is similar to [the enumerated activities] and that the Commission determines, by rule or regulation, to be contrary to the public interest. [read post]
26 Oct 2024, 7:41 am
Lopez(1995) and United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 6:33 am
Li v. [read post]
5 Oct 2024, 9:05 pm
From the Supreme Court in NCAA v. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:16 am
Some cops have license plate readers in their vehicle that hook them right up. [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 4:05 am
Justice Chan Keeps Quontic on the Hook. [read post]
25 Aug 2024, 5:33 am
There was disagreement on the reasoning, but only two members of the 16-judge en banc panel dissented that the state’s permit process is constitutional, despite the Supreme Court’s significant expansion of gun rights in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
24 Aug 2024, 11:51 am
Case Citation: Nicholas Services, LLC v. [read post]
Supreme Court Endorses Neutrality Triangulation Approach to Constitutionality of Platform Regulation
22 Aug 2024, 7:00 am
Last month’s decision in Moody v. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 8:42 am
The court summarizes: The primary effect of the DPIA provision is to compel speech…The State cannot insulate a specific provision of law from a facial challenge under the First Amendment by bundling it with other, separate provisions that do not implicate the First Amendment The court also says that the DPIA requirement “deputizes covered businesses into serving as censors for the State” because the DPIA risk “factors require consideration of content or… [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 7:58 am
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
9 Aug 2024, 3:28 pm
“United States v. 1855.6 Pounds of American Paddlefish Meat” (Nov. 14, 2018) and also cf. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 3:00 am
The patent claims The defendants argued that the patent claims were not real claims as they were being used solely as a jurisdictional hook to enable Telsa to pursue the licensing claims that were the real substance of the claim. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court held in Becerra v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 8:43 am
(citing United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 3:00 am
I’ll let you go first, since you went off to, I think, our 50th state, Hawaii, Marlene Gebauer 1:34 that’s right, I went to Hawaii, and both of us had some some we put some distance, you know, we put some miles on the airplane. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 9:07 pm
Those creditors would not have the same interests as the state (and would include creditors in other classes), but the state would be bound by their vote and would have to share the [read post]
