Search for: "Hughes v. United States Department of Justice" Results 41 - 60 of 158
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2020, 8:30 am by Tia Sewell, Anna Salvatore
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s Sept. 2 decision on United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 10:17 am by John Elwood
The case raises the same issue as Hughes v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 5:00 am
Although these witnesses did not quantify the exact cost of the many hours of labor expended, the United States introduced Exhibit 6 to make such a quantification. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 9:18 am by Adam Feldman
As is usually the case, the United States is the most frequent amicus group on the merits so far this term. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 4:34 am by Edith Roberts
” The editorial board of the New York Sun deplores the fact that “the State Department just signed a brief that puts the Trump administration on the side of the PLO — and against American victims of terror” in Sokolow v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 1:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lee-Hirons v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 26 April 2016. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 7:00 am by Seamus Hughes, Devorah Margolin
Seamus Hughes and Devorah Margolin of George Washington University’s Program on Extremism provide a picture of the current danger to the United States, emphasizing how the threat has fractured in recent years. [read post]
31 May 2018, 11:18 am by Scott Bomboy
Miller, Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes said when it came to a ratification dispute, it was a “question for the political departments, with the ultimate authority in the Congress in the exercise of its control over the promulgation of the adoption of the amendment. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 1:38 pm by Peter Margulies
§ 1182(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), which authorizes the president to bar entry of foreign nationals “detrimental to the interests of the United States”—the same provision that Trump used for his travel ban, which the Supreme Court upheld in Trump v. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
United States NPR reports on the so-called “pink slime” libel case between Beef Products Inc and ABC News will take place in a South Dakota state court this week. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 2:13 am by INFORRM
The claimants, who include the Duke of Sussex, Guy Ritchie, Hugh Grant and Doreen Lawrence, sought to add further evidence to their claim, including 235 stories which appeared in the Sun and News of the World between 1994 and 2016. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 11:02 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
GuestKat Rose Hughes commented on the recent statement issued by the PEB in this regard. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 5:25 pm by INFORRM
   The argument was mentioned in Fayed v United Kingdom ((1994) 18 EHRR 393) and it was accepted in Rotaru v Romania ((2000) 8 BHRC 449 [44]). [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 2:46 am by Dennis Crouch
Aultman-Miller Co., 169 U.S. 606 (1898): The only authority competent to set a patent aside, or to annul it, or to correct it for any reason whatever, is vested in the courts of the United States, and not in the department which issued the patent. [read post]