Search for: "IN RE: MARK W. ROGERS"
Results 41 - 60
of 126
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2018, 3:56 am
" In re Innovatio IP Ventures, 2013 WL 5593609, at *9 (N.D. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:11 am
Why would that endanger Rogers? [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 1:05 pm
Already we’re starting to see the details wearing away. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 10:31 am
Abandoned marks: using UC to deal w/remaining source ID meaning—we could do that, but instead we treat them like TMs and are willing to grant full relief. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
Elsewhere, the Court of Justice of the European Union has defined, re-defined and refined its own and (perhaps) our understanding of what the right of 'communication to the public' under Article 3(1) of the InfoSoc Directive actually is. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 7:43 am
Ought to treat them differently from word mark and logos; we’ve lost something by refusing to consider ontology (at least claiming to).RT: Rogers as proof of concept. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 5:24 pm
Senator Mark Warner (R-VA) said, “I found it very interesting that … you made clear that you wrote that memo in a way that was unclassified… [W]as that because you felt at some point, the facts of that meeting would have to come clean and come clear … in a way that could be shared with the American people? [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 1:13 pm
The Razor's Edge by by W. [read post]
31 Dec 2016, 11:15 am
The Razor's Edge by by W. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:49 am
Rogers College of Law on August 31. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 1:32 pm
Natural Res. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 1:03 am
He has hired Sydney media lawyer Mark O’Brien to take legal action. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 10:03 am
But what’s wrong with that if they’re advertising falsely? [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 1:07 pm
A brief review of the justifications usually given for the exclusions for marks that are scandalous or disparaging: (1) the harm done by the government endorsement represented by a registration; (2) the desire to withhold government resources from disparaging or scandalous terms; (3) the lack of any effect on a user’s ability or right to use the mark, with (a) possible §43(a) or state common law protection against confusing uses despite unregistrability, though… [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 11:28 am
I’m also a fan of Rogers v. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 1:21 pm
Less problem w/identifying a claimant to the mark, usually, b/c of public use requirement. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
Normally when we talk about consumer protection we’re concerned w/ a particular category of consumers regarded as vulnerable: lack the same level of info as businesses in the marketplace. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 11:05 am
One approach uses Rogers for both, which makes sense since Rogers itself involved both claims. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 2:45 pm
Developing consensus around expressive uses/use of marks in expressive works, a set of doctrines prominently associated with Rogers v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 9:58 am
Rolls Royce sued a rapper named Royce Rizzy, demanding he stop using the RR mark in connection w/stage shows, albums, and merchandise. [read post]
