Search for: "In re Griffin" Results 41 - 60 of 723
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2012, 3:06 pm
We are writing in Lavonne Griffin-Valade for mayor, and we hope other Portlanders follow suit. [read post]
12 May 2020, 9:17 am by Melanie Griffin
by guest author Melanie Griffin The UofSC Law Library extends its usefulness way beyond its physical walls, now more than ever. [read post]
7 May 2019, 6:27 am by Tom Church
United States, No. 18-10523 (April 29, 2019), Denial of Rehearing En Banc The Court denied the petitioner’s request for a rehearing en banc, leaving in place the rule in In re Griffin that provisions of the Sentencing Guidelines cannot be challenged as void-for-vagueness and that the Supreme Court’s rule in Johnson is… The post Stony Lester v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 4:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  It’s almost as if we’re having a serious conversation about copyright reform. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 1:53 pm by Melanie Griffin
by guest author Melanie Griffin Finding a focus topic is when law school really gets interesting. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 12:21 pm
The FBA presents a Webinar: Honoring the Legacy of Associate Justice Sandra Day O’Connor(January 25 @ 2:00 pm - 3:00 pm EST) -- The Federal Bar Association is honored to welcome three of Justice Sandra Day O’Connor’s incredibly successful former law clerks – Professor Lisa Griffin (Duke), Professor Oona Hathaway (Yale), and Silvija Strikis (Partner, Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick, PLLC) – to discuss her 25 years as an Associate Justice… [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 3:38 am
IRS Staffer to Address Section 162(m) Uncertainties During Tomorrow's Webcast We're excited to have Ken Griffin, Associate General Counsel in the IRS' Executive Compensation Branch (and the Staffer who signed the PLR at issue) join the panel for tomorrow's webcast on CompensationStandards.com - "The New IRS Letter Ruling: How It Impacts Your Employment Arrangements, Accounting, Proxy Disclosures, Etc. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 2:08 pm by David Markus
See In re Griffin, No. 16-12012, __ F.3d __, 2016 WL 3002293 (11th Cir. [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 6:44 am by Jack Bogdanski
Between Griffin and Billups, I'd take Griffin. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 4:24 pm by Mary A. Fischer
There were a number of people, of course, who thought ‘oh, no, you’re going too far, you’re going to be set back. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 7:59 pm by Jeralyn
If you didn't watch VH-1 Divas, catch it on the re-run. [read post]
23 Apr 2022, 1:04 pm by Gerard N. Magliocca
In a recent post, I explained that the holding of In Re Griffin, a leading case on Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment, cannot be properly understood without recognizing that Virginia was an unreconstructed state when the decision was made. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 3:46 am by Russ Bensing
Griffin the 5th District decided that Baker gave Sandra Griffin a get-out-of-jail card. [read post]
27 May 2022, 5:05 am by Gerard Magliocca
In Footnote 16, he states that In Re Griffin, a Section Three case decided on circuit by Chief Justice Chase in 1869, is "too... [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:58 am by Gerard Magliocca
In my original Section Three article and in this report, I contend that Chief Justice Chase’s interpretation of Section Three in his circuit opinion in In Re Griffin was inconsistent with his conclusion about Section Three in the pre-trial proceedings for Jefferson Davis’s treason trial. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 12:53 pm by Gerard Magliocca
Let's continue with my discussion of the first Fourteenth Amendment opinion--In Re Griffin. [read post]