Search for: "In re INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 9"
Results 41 - 60
of 796
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2023, 4:15 pm
§ 3771(a)(9). [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 4:57 pm
When I started reading this opinion, I went a little too fast on the first page, read on a few more pages, got really confused, re-read the first page, and then re-read the next four pages, marveling and what happened. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 9:20 am
The prosecutor amended the citation by striking through the charging language and handwriting the word “shoplifting” on the citation, along with the prosecutor’s initials and the date. [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 5:12 pm
As the court described it, the venture was initially profitable, but the relationship between the two members eventually splintered and collapsed. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 9:07 am
Additionally, we also note that that the problem is compoundedby the fact that respondents were apparently not appointed counsel when the initial denial ofparenting time occurred. [read post]
12 May 2017, 2:16 pm
But maybe there's hope we're actually -- actually -- making a difference. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 8:25 am
Upon the appellant's petition for review pursuant to Article 112a EPC, the Enlarged Board of Appeal set aside decision T 1627/09 and ordered the proceedings before the Board 3.3.08 to be re-opened (decision R 2/14 of 22 April 2016).IV. [read post]
15 May 2015, 6:00 am
Question #9 – Family Based Immigration As a Lawful Permanent Resident, can I file an I-130 petition for my family members? [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 5:00 am
Question #9 – Family Based Immigration As a Lawful Permanent Resident, can I file an I-130 petition for my family members? [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 8:34 am
” He believed that the number of mistaken/unjust cases were small in number, and 90% of the petitioning cases involved cases decided properly, with 9% with some errors, but only 1% with errors serious enough for the case to be re-tried. [read post]
6 May 2020, 7:58 am
However, on petition from the USPTO, the court has now re-designated the decision as precedential. [read post]
1 May 2012, 3:45 am
The case, In re MSTG, 08-CV-7411 (CAFC April 9, 2012), may have very significant ramifications in trademark and patent disputes. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:13 pm
9 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 11:01 am
That’s exactly what the Jane Does want to do: they want to “re-open” the federal Jeffrey Epstein case. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 10:30 am
Scialabba v. de Osorio, US Supreme Court (6/9/14)Immigration LawQualifying U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents (LPRs) may petition for family members to obtain immigrant visas. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 2:02 pm
Apple Inc., 809 F.3d 1307, 1313–14 (Fed.Cir. 2015) (refusing to review Board’s consideration ofobviousness in the final decision despite not being raisedin the initial petition); Achates, 803 F.3d at 658 (refusingto review the Board’s assessment of the time-bar provisionsof § 315(b)); In re Cuozzo Speed Techs., LLC, 793F.3d 1268, 1273–74 (Fed. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 6:00 am
Answer #6 A Re-entry permit! [read post]
10 May 2015, 2:50 pm
But the Commission is taking the position that the initial JPML drawing – triggered by the two supposedly premature petitions – is the only drawing that needs to be done. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 1:46 pm
The tires on Roger Rodas’ car were over 9 years old. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 5:53 am
” In re Marriage of Gordon, 233 Ill. [read post]
