Search for: "Jeffery v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 204
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2020, 4:28 am
And further dispute arose between Sheeran's song 'Photograph' (also written by the first and third claimants; Sheeran and McDaid) and a song called 'Amazing', following which there was a settlement agreement and 35% of the PRS royalties now go to the writers of 'Amazing'.Naturally, the Claimants sought to strike out these allegations, which came before Deputy Master Jefferis on 4 June 2019 on the basis that similar fact evidence is only admissible in civil… [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 2:26 pm
In addition, at trial, the state is permitted to tell the jury that you refused and to argue that this is "evidence of a guilty mind". 625 ILCS 5/11-501.2; City of Rockford v. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 5:15 am
This is consistent with the Seventh Circuit’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 5:18 am
" Finally, the plaintiff's challenged the failure to provide meaningful disclosure regarding Jefferies fees, because the proxy statement merely stated that they were "customary". [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 4:51 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 As is often the case with 3-judge panels, one jurist stays poker-faced; this time, it was Bush appointee, Judge Jeffery Sutton.Since the SCOTUS decision in United States v Windsor, nearly every state's federal court system has cultivated a same-sex marriage case, usually challenging the constitutionality of a state law that bans or limits the rights of same-sex couples. [read post]
29 Aug 2015, 10:29 pm by Patricia Salkin
Relator-landowner Jeffery August owned a 20–acre tract of land located in the Sunrise Township, zoned for agricultural use. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 3:55 pm by Joe Austin, E.D. Tenn.
After initially deciding the case in an unpublished order, the Sixth Circuit later ordered publication of its decision in United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 12:30 pm
Defendant raises another hurdle to success on the merits, however, by referring to the case of United States v. [read post]