Search for: "Jeffrey Karek"
Results 41 - 60
of 70
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2018, 12:13 pm
Accordingly, the Ninth Circuit reversed the… Jeffrey Karek [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 6:05 am
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that a civil investigative demand (CID) issued by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau did not adequately advise the respondent of the nature of the conduct constituting the alleged violation under investigation and the provision of… Jeffrey Karek [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 7:51 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently held that class plaintiffs alleged a concrete and particularized harm sufficient to confer Article III standing where the defendant company’s alleged collection, use, and storage of the plaintiffs’ biometric information was the substantive harm targeted… Jeffrey Karek [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 8:13 am
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit recently held that, unless the parties to a class action settlement agreement expressly agree otherwise, class settlement agreements should not be read to bar objectors from requesting fees for their efforts in adding value to a… Jeffrey Karek [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 7:52 am
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, on an issue of first impression at the federal appellate level, recently held that the Merrill doctrine – which prevents federal government instrumentalities from being bound by the unauthorized acts of their agents – applies to… Jeffrey Karek [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 8:36 am
… Jeffrey Karek [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 8:46 am
§ 1658(a) applies to private suits alleging violations of section 303(c) of the federal Servicemembers Credit… Jeffrey Karek [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 8:32 am
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit recently held that a borrowers’ federal court claim attempting to void a foreclosure sale based on a prior demand to cancel the loan under the federal Truth in Lending Act (TILA) was barred by claim preclusion for failure to raise the issue in a prior state […] Jeffrey Karek [read post]
30 May 2019, 7:31 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that even if a class action case is brought pursuant to a fee-shifting statute, common-fund principles control fee awards authorized from a common fund, and a common-fund fee award may be calculated as the lodestar… Jeffrey Karek [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 8:24 am
Lee, and that “when a trustee… Jeffrey Karek [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 7:14 am
Accordingly, the… Jeffrey Karek [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 8:06 am
Accordingly, the Seventh Circuit affirmed the trial… Jeffrey Karek [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 6:34 am
Therefore, the Court held, the debt collectors’ dunning letters demanding the principal sums owed and 5 percent per annum interest did not violate the federal […] Jeffrey Karek [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:56 am
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held that a collection letter sent to collect a time-barred debt that makes a “settlement offer” to accept payment “in settlement of” the debt could potentially violate the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act’s (FDCPA) general prohibition against “any false, deceptive, or misleading representation or means Read more → Jeffrey Karek [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 7:08 am
Accordingly, the Third Circuit reversed […] Jeffrey Karek [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 11:07 am
Accordingly, the Eleventh Circuit […] Jeffrey Karek [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 7:11 am
Accordingly,… Jeffrey Karek [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 7:08 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that an online payday lender’s “loan note” violated § 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act because, although it was “technically accurate,” the lender’s online loan portal made it difficult to discern the loan terms… Jeffrey Karek [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 7:34 am
In so ruling, the Sixth Circuit reversed the Read more → Jeffrey Karek [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:46 am
[…] Jeffrey Karek [read post]
