Search for: "John Doe v. Jane Doe" Results 41 - 60 of 461
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2020, 9:44 am by Andy Taylor
The Plaintiffs then filed a motion to dismiss their claims against the individuals and the John/Jane Doe defendants with prejudice. [read post]
24 Mar 2018, 8:20 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Her opinion begins: Appellant John Turner asks us to overrule nearly four decades of circuit precedent holding that the Sixth Amendment right to counsel does not extend to preindictment plea negotiations. . . . [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 4:14 am
Del Rio (WL 3616963):In this civil rights action, plaintiffs Jane and John Doe seek damages from defendant police officers and the City of New York for allegedly egregious acts of police brutality and abuse. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 5:28 am by SHG
On the evening of December 14, 2014, Plaintiff John Doe, Jane Roe, and several of Doe’s friends, identified as “K.P” and “A.S. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 10:13 am by Blair & Kim, PLLC
She also argued the hearing was flawed because she was not allowed to cross-examine John Doe, based on Doe v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 1:53 pm
  Or on the bar exam:"John sends a text message to Jane offering to give her $200 in return for sex. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 12:57 pm
Williamsburg Facility Operations, LLC, d/b/a Consulate Health Care of Williamsburg, and “Jane Roe/John Doe” in Circuit Court for York County and the Town of Poquoson, Virginia. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 6:07 am by Eugene Volokh
An unincorporated association, the Concerned Jewish Parents and Teachers of Los Angeles, along with six individuals using the pseudonyms Jane or John Doe ("Doe plaintiffs") initiated this action …. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 10:06 am by John Stephen
In Jane Doe v City of Detroit, the court upheld summary judgment for Detroit on a transgender employee’s complaint of harassment. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 8:09 am by Eugene Volokh
USC's procedures didn't fairly treat the accused, a California appellate court rules.From Tuesday's California Court of Appeal decision in Doe v. [read post]