Search for: "Jordan v. Bear" Results 41 - 60 of 152
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
A recent decision of the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal (Abrametz v Law Society of Saskatchewan) suggests that the Jordan principles might have a significant impact. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 3:18 am by Sally-Ann Underhill
In Sea Master Shipping Inc v Arab Bank (Switzerland) Ltd & Yousef Freiha & Sons SA [2020] EWHC 2030, Owners, in a situation where Charterers were in insolvent liquidation and unable to meet their obligations under a voyage charter, sought to hold receivers liable for delay at the discharge port under the bill of lading. [read post]
29 May 2020, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
They bear all the pressures and substantial obligations that must be endured and performed by good practising lawyers that leave benchers without the time and freedom for risk-taking as to time, cost, and failure, that bringing about such significant innovation requires. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 10:25 am by Guest Blogger
Governor of Florida (also known as “Docs v Glocks”). [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 2:40 pm
I am happy to report the publication of my article,  "The Corporate Social Responsibilities of Financial Institutions for the Conduct of their Borrowers: The View From International Law and Standards," Lewis & CLark Law Review 21(4):881-920 (2018). [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 7:14 am
This is the interesting question that the US Court of Appeals for the 9thCircuit recently addressed in Rentmeester v Nike. [read post]