Search for: "King Enterprises, Inc. v. the United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 110
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2007, 1:11 am
United States U.S. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 7:51 am
Most recently, in McDonald v. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
In support of its argument that NJT was an "arm of the state" entitled to invoke sovereign immunity, defendants cited a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit holding that NJT is entitled to invoke sovereign immunity in federal court (see Karns v Shanahan, 879 F3d 504, 519 [3d Cir 2018]). [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
In support of its argument that NJT was an "arm of the state" entitled to invoke sovereign immunity, defendants cited a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit holding that NJT is entitled to invoke sovereign immunity in federal court (see Karns v Shanahan, 879 F3d 504, 519 [3d Cir 2018]). [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 7:15 am
The Nevada Cerebral Palsy Resource Guide contains State resources compiled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 9:42 am
Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 4:00 am
King where the discount was applied to the entire enterprise value. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
In a recent book review in Foreign Affairs, Professor Charles King of Georgetown University diagnoses the rise of new versions of illiberal philosophies that purport to explain and provide direction for populist movements arising in the last few decades in the United States and around the world.[6] A trio of recent books, according to King, illustrate these views. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 3:06 am
Shri Kristina Enterprises Inc filed 03/12/07 1:07-cv-01389 Harris et al v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 7:16 am
Efforts made by Chinese enterprises operating in the United States to comply with PRC state secrets laws can create difficulties in complying with US regulations and disclosure requirements. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 5:27 pm
Books A Million, Inc. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
16 Aug 2014, 12:15 pm
Sebelius and King v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 7:39 am
This list was put together by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 1:02 pm
Enterprises v. [read post]
