Search for: "Koehler v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 79
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2023, 6:20 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “A cause of action for malpractice cannot be maintained as against an individual attorney hired by plaintiffs union to handle a disciplinary proceeding under the union’s CBA (see Cherry v Koehler & Isaacs LLP, 96 AD3d 507 [1st Dept 2012]). [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 12:45 am by Kevin LaCroix
In its January 10, 2012 opinion in CompuCredit v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 6:20 pm
Fast forward a year: the Kuehne prosecution has caved in on itself [click here] and in a ruling that should warm the hearts of probate lawyers everywhere, Georgia's Supreme Court confirmed in Levenson v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 6:20 pm by LexBlog
Fast forward a year: the Kuehne prosecution has caved in on itself [click here] and in a ruling that should warm the hearts of probate lawyers everywhere, Georgia's Supreme Court confirmed in Levenson v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 4:11 am by SHG
Jamison Koehler puts it succinctly: Brady v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 6:45 pm by Mark Bennett
So it's not at all inappropriate that today we should celebrate Scott Greenfield Day in the blawgosphere, as at Norm Pattis, Blawg Review, Koehler Law, Crime and Federalism, John Kindley's People v. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 5:24 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court issued its 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
[Allman v Koehler, 161 A.D.2d 114]Dismissal of a 17-year employee who failed to report her intended absence on two occasions. [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 6:45 am
Munguia    Eastern District of Tennessee of Chattanooga 08a0198n.062008/04/16 Koehler v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:01 am by Eric Turkewitz
State) Supporting Scott Greenfield (Koehler) Scott Greenfield Day (Defending People) A Tribute to one of the Four Horsemen: Scott Greenfield and His Simple Justice Blawg (Trial Warrior Blog) [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 10:15 am by William McGrath
According to Professor Mike Koehler of the FCPA Professor Blog, Judge Leon stated: [V]iewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the Government, the Court does not believe the Government has produced sufficient evidence to enable a rational trier of fact to conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that each of these six defendants participated in the overarching conspiracy charged in the superseding indictment in this case. [read post]