Search for: "Lambert v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 213
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2024, 6:47 am
Whistleblower DQ of Assistant US Attorney Denied: “United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 9:00 am
Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit issued its ruling in Young v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 7:51 am
Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 10:31 am
United States Department of Interior, et al. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 11:16 pm
Infringement of Claim 3 The focus of the infringement ruling is Claim 3, stating --“use of pregabalin for the preparation of a pharmaceutical composition for treating neuropathic pain”.The claim in question is a purpose-limited process claim. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 8:56 pm
The constitutional issues were previously decided by the Eleventh Circuit in United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 5:47 pm
[cites omitted] However, in light of our supreme court's rationale in Lambert v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 12:58 pm
In Lambert v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 2:43 pm
United States, 132 S.Ct. 2492 (2012), and Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 7:58 am
Lambert of DC’s Bingham McCutchen (with Robert C. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
.* Warner-Lambert v Actavis Mark 4: harmony between parties in ‘lyrical’ patent disputeLast Thursday, Jeremy reported a High Court Order obtained by Warner-Lambert (part of the Pfizer group) mandating the NHS to release guidance about the prescribing of pregabalin (Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group PTC EHF & Others[2015] EWHC 485 (Pat) (02 March 2015)) [on which see the IPKat earlier posts, here and here]. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 12:44 pm
(Joinder; Tribal Sovereign Immunity) United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 11:58 am
See, e.g., Lambert v. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 7:45 am
Medtronic and Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 8:58 am
Journal of the Supreme Court of the United States The Journal of the Supreme Court of the United States contains the “official minutes” of the Court. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 7:36 am
Lloyd's of London, 135 F.3d 1289, 1292 (9th Cir.1998) (applying Rule 12(b)(3) to an international forum-selection clause); Lambert v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 7:33 am
Lloyd's of London, 135 F.3d 1289, 1292 (9th Cir.1998) (applying Rule 12(b)(3) to an international forum-selection clause); Lambert v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
As Wikipedia explains, [i]n the United States, removal jurisdiction refers to the right of a defendant to move a lawsuit filed in state court to the federal district court for the federal judicial district in which the state court sits. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 9:03 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 3:26 pm
All right, Luis and Angel in Spain have been doing that for with his opponent countries over 35 years, and not just in the United States, but worldwide. [read post]
