Search for: "London v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 3,578
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2024, 11:29 am by Giles Peaker
ZRR, R (On the Application Of) v London Borough of Bexley (2024) EWHC 2073 (Admin) This was a judicial review of Bexley’s contention that temporary accommodation offered to ZRR under s.190 Housing Act 1996 was suitable and its duty was discharged when ZRR refused that accommodation. [read post]
4 Aug 2024, 10:40 am by Giles Peaker
UO v London Borough of Redbridge (2024) EWHC 1989 (Admin) We first saw UO and Redbridge in this judicial review of an unlawful housing needs assessment (HNA) and suitability decision. [read post]
4 Aug 2024, 4:03 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
  On 9 July, Clark was appointed Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for AI and Digital Government at the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 8:56 am by Laura
He stated: “In my view the father’s presentation before me was sensible, honest and reliable…. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 8:07 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
  The order from 26 April 2024 in AIM Sport Development AG v Supponor (UPC CoA 500/2023) demonstrated gold-medal deadline flexibility. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 2:16 am by INFORRM
The far-right campaigner, Tommy Robinson is reported to have screened the film Silenced at a London demonstration in contravention of a High Court order. [read post]
28 Jul 2024, 12:57 am by Frank Cranmer
In Sutcliffe v Secretary of State for Education [2024] EWHC 1878 (Admin), Pepperall J commenced his judgment as follows: “[1]. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Michael McConnell discusses Trump v. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 1:15 am by Tessa Shepperson
Chung v Notting Hill Genesis This is a case that exemplifies the Court’s power to extend time limits. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
” On 2 July 2024, some arrived with placards stating: “Jurors have an absolute right to acquit a defendant according to their conscience. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 3:04 am by Giles Peaker
On ‘maintenance’, the Upper Tribunal considered Assethold Limited v Watts (2014) UKUT 537, Welsh v London Borough of Greenwich (2000) 3 EGLR 41, Fluor Daniel Properties Ltd and ors v Shortlands Investments Ltd (2001) 2 EGLR 103, and Mason v Totalfinaelf UK Limited (2003) EWHC 1604 (Ch), to arrive at the conclusion that a covenant to maintain was only engaged where there is some form of physical deterioration; none of the cases… [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 1:15 am by INFORRM
The key conclusion which the Judge comes to is that the state of the law on this issue is currently ‘uncertain and in flux’, and so ‘probably requires the attention of an appellate court’ ([107]). [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 1:57 am by INFORRM
The Judge re-stated the need to make allowance for editorial judgment, citing the principles summarised in Banks-v-Cadwalladr [2022] 1 WLR 5236. [read post]