Search for: "Long v. Hooks" Results 41 - 60 of 750
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2013, 7:38 am
The court is being asked to revisit this issue in another case now pending on petition for review, Hooks v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
Bringing or defending a claim immediately puts a party on the hook for tens of thousands of pounds. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 5:18 am by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch Helsinn Healthcare v. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 1:42 pm by Josh Blackman
I have long admired Noah Feldman as a sober arbiter of constitutional law. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 1:52 pm
 But having just read the complaint and the statements from Chairman Leibowitz and Commissioner Rosch discussing the various rationales for making Section 5 the primary hook for this case, I wanted to share two thoughts about defenses for the move that appear in those statements. [read post]
13 May 2010, 6:56 am by Ross Dannenberg (Gamertag: Aviator)
Lime Group LLC et al., S.D.N.Y. case 06-cv-5936.If you use LimeWire, you might not be using it for long... [read post]
17 May 2024, 12:29 pm by Josh Blackman
During oral argument in this case, Justice Jackson fixated on the absence of any "textual hook. [read post]
11 May 2010, 8:19 am by Daniel Schwartz
It has long been the rule in the Second Circuit, that individual supervisors do not have liability under Title VII claims, based on the case of Tomka v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 4:00 pm
On the ninth day of jury selection in the case of United States of America v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Determining if a complaint alleging sexual harassment based a claim of a continuing violation of New York State's Human Rights Law is timelyLozada v Elmont Hook & Ladder Co. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 5:30 am by Josh Blackman
I've long thought the most consequential decision is also a sleeper case: Mallory v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 3:05 am by Walter Olson
It is worth making explicit the parallels between the Supreme Court’s acknowledgment of the first in New York Times v. [read post]