Search for: "Lynch v. Lynch"
Results 41 - 60
of 2,652
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2024, 6:18 am
But the Second Circuit has also said, notably in Henry v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 12:05 am
Resources: The New Yorker: “A Facial-Recognition Tour of New York” (Jan. 15, 2024) EFF: “Clearview AI—Yet Another Example of Why We Need A Ban on Law Enforcement Use of Face Recognition Now” (Jan. 31, 2020) EFF on Face Recognition Technology Testimony of EFF’s Jennifer Lynch on Face Recognition to the House Oversight Committee (March 2017) ACLU v. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 9:30 pm
ICYMI: "Maricopa County Honors Public Defenders and Landmark Legal Victories [such as Gideon v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 12:25 pm
Lynch, 806 F.3d 259 (4th Cir. 2015); Farah v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 5:04 pm
On 7-8 March 2024, there was a hearing in the data protection case of Lynch v Serious Fraud Office KB-2024-000237. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am
On 27 February 2024, there was a hearing in the case of Rodoy v Optical Express Limited and others KB-2023-002437. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 5:16 pm
The famous Brandeis brief appears around that time, in such cases as Muller v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
For the Balkinization symposium on Robert Post, The Taft Court: Making Law for a Divided Nation, 1921–1930 (Cambridge University Press, 2024).Robert Post Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., who devised the funds (symbolically) supporting the volume discussed in this symposium, lived most of his life in the shadow of his rock star father, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:21 pm
In United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 7:13 pm
Lynch (5th Cir. 2016). [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:34 am
The case is Family Equality v. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 5:12 am
" United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 1:39 pm
Grp., LLC v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 8:42 am
Today's advance release medical malpractice law opinion: Lynch v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1] This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 12:11 am
The plaintiffs lose.The case is Reese v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
You are probably well acquainted with its successor, rule 506.[2] Prior to the adoption of former rule 146 in April 1974, the Commission did not have rules interpreting section 4(2) of the Securities Act.[3] As a result, issuers faced uncertainty in determining whether a sale of securities did not involve “any public offering” and in applying case law on the topic, including the Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:10 am
Conde Nast chief executive Roger Lynch has warned that “many” media companies could go out of business in the time it would take for litigation against generative AI companies to pass through the courts. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 8:53 am
Lynch, 576 U.S. 143, 150 (2015) (cleaned up). [read post]
