Search for: "Mark MacCarthy" Results 41 - 60 of 66
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2019, 3:01 pm by Stewart Baker
Mark MacCarthy elaborates: One new law would force companies like Uber and Lyft (and a boatload of others) to treat gig economy workers as employees, not contractors. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 3:09 pm by Matt Gluck
Stewart Baker shared an episode of the Cyberlaw Podcast in which he discusses the EARN IT Act, TikTok and hate speech on U.S. social media platforms, among other topics with Dave Aitel, CEO of Immunity Inc.; Mark MacCarthy, a senior fellow at Georgetown Law and Business schools; and Nick Weaver, a senior staff researcher at the International Computer Science Institute in Berkeley, California and a lecturer in the computer science department at the University of California at… [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 2:34 pm by Stewart Baker
Mark MacCarthy tells us that reports of UChicago weather turning sunny and warm for hipster antitrust are probably overdone. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 5:07 pm by Stewart Baker
We then return to Illinois's recent law regulating AI hiring interviews systems like HireVue, and sparks fly again as Mark MacCarthy and I mix it up over allegations of AI "bias. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 5:00 pm by Stewart Baker
Speaking of ugly lawsuits, Mark MacCarthy and Paul Rosenzweig comment on the Center for Democracy and Technology's complaint that Trump violated tech companies' right to free speech with his executive order on section 230. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 12:54 pm by Stewart Baker
Mark MacCarthy explains that the law prohibits use of biometrics (like  pictures of your face) without consent. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 2:35 pm by Stewart Baker
In the news, Maury Shenk and Mark MacCarthy describe the growing field of censorship-as-a-service and the competition between US and Chinese vendors. [read post]
18 May 2020, 3:03 pm by Stewart Baker
" Mark MacCarthy previews France's (and Germany's and the EU's and the UK's) increasingly tough sanctions for US social media firms that fail to remove "hate speech" and other bad content within 24 hours (or sometimes one hour). [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 8:38 am by Stewart Baker
Enthusiasts for end-to-end encryption should be worried, Mark MacCarthy and I conclude. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 8:41 am by Stewart Baker
In the news roundup, we give a lick and a promise to today's Supreme Court decision in the fight between Oracle and Google over API copyrights, but Mark MacCarthy takes us deep on the Supreme Court's decision cutting the heart out of most, class actions for robocalling. [read post]
27 Jun 2020, 4:07 am by Matt Gluck, Tia Sewell
Mark MacCarthy argued that passing legislation, not reforming Section 230, will be most productive in increasing transparency and accountability for online platforms: Jacob Schulz analyzed France’s constitutional court’s rejection of much of a new law related to online hate speech and explained what was in the original legislation. [read post]
26 Sep 2020, 8:45 am by Anna Salvatore, Tia Sewell
Stewart Baker released an episode of The Cyberlaw Podcast featuring a conversation with John Yoo and Mark MacCarthy about a federal court’s recent injunction against banning WeChat. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 8:50 am by Eve Gaumond
Mark MacCarthy and Kenneth Propp have called the proposed regulation “a comprehensive and thoughtful start to the legislative process in Europe [that] might prove to be the basis for trans-Atlantic cooperation. [read post]
6 Mar 2021, 5:47 am by Victoria Gallegos
Howell shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast, featuring an interview with Franks, law professor at the University of Miami, about her recent Lawfare paper: Nicol Turner Lee shared an episode of TechTank, featuring a discussion about Section 230 and the regulation of free speech online: Mark MacCarthy examined the future of Section 230 reform. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 4:38 pm by Stewart Baker
Mark MacCarthy says that risk is overrated, but the prospects for such payment schemes are pretty good. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 3:21 am
" I'm not sure of the importance of this distinction; Richard's "statements" clearly required (and elicited) answers; one of them was even voiced with a rising intonation (indicated in my transcription with a question mark). [read post]