Search for: "Massachusetts v. Rhode Island" Results 41 - 60 of 445
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2020, 11:30 am by Tammy Binford, Contributing Editor
The lawsuit was filed by the District of Columbia and 17 states: New York, Pennsylvania, California, Colorado, Delaware, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, Washington, Vermont, and Virginia. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
The state Constitutions of Colorado, Florida, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and South Dakota authorize advisory opinions, whereas Alabama and Delaware provide the advisory power through statutes. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 1:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Massachusetts’ new sourcing rule is not a convenience rule per se because it uses a different, pandemic-contingent standard: the taxpayer continues to have Massachusetts income tax liability if they worked out of Massachusetts prior to the pandemic and are now working remotely from another state. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 11:01 am by Jon L. Gelman
Our phased reopening in conditions where case incidence remains high ensures a long and slow recovery, not a V-shaped recovery. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
By FY 2018, Connecticut homeowners paid an effective rate of 1.70 percent on the fair market value of their property, compared to 1.11 percent nationwide and 1.15, 1.40, and 1.53 percent respectively in Massachusetts, New York, and Rhode Island. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 1:05 pm by Marissa Morte
Other states, such as Rhode Island, exempt most lenders and creditors from UDAP coverage.[2] By way of example, Massachusetts’ UDAP statute, known as “Chapter 93A” broadly prohibits “unfair methods of competition and unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the conduct of any trade or commerce. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 10:26 am by Kevin Kaufman
The Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Murphy v. [read post]
New York, Maine, Virginia, the District of Columbia, Vermont, New Jersey, Connecticut, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Illinois (in part), Delaware, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, North Carolina (in part) and Ohio (1) have a significant number of [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 8:08 am by Rob Natelson
After the Confederation, Congress sent the proposed Constitution to the states for ratification, and each state legislature (although Rhode Island only belatedly) arranged for the election of delegates to that state’s ratifying convention. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 12:36 pm by doug
Leaving aside the issue of whether BAP opinions have any precedential value to start with, the Bullard case essentially terminated the use of hybrid plans in Massachusetts, Maine, New Hampshire, and Rhode Island. [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 6:48 am by Seth Jaffe
  Moreover, the conservatives on the Court can rub the language of Massachusetts v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 9:21 am by Kevin Kaufman
Delaware, Rhode Island, and Pennsylvania are the other states with uncommonly high rates. [read post]
Following in the footsteps of its neighbors Maine, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire, Rhode Island recently enacted legislation that restricts the use of non-competition agreements with certain types of employees. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 4:17 am by Chris Castle
Act. 6993, Delaware Chancery Court (Mar. 30, 2012) at 12; Brief of Amici Curiae Attorneys General for the Commonwealths of Kentucky, Massachusetts, and Pennsylvania, the States of Arizona, Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South… [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 7:30 am by Denise Elliott
In ruling for the plaintiff in the Palmiter case, Judge Nealon followed the trend of judges in Delaware, Rhode Island, New Jersey, Connecticut, Massachusetts and Arizona, all of whom have ruled in favor of patients/employees certified under state law to use medical marijuana. [read post]