Search for: "Massachusetts v. Rhode Island"
Results 41 - 60
of 445
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2020, 11:30 am
The lawsuit was filed by the District of Columbia and 17 states: New York, Pennsylvania, California, Colorado, Delaware, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, Washington, Vermont, and Virginia. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 10:54 am
Patane v. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
The state Constitutions of Colorado, Florida, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and South Dakota authorize advisory opinions, whereas Alabama and Delaware provide the advisory power through statutes. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 1:55 am
Massachusetts’ new sourcing rule is not a convenience rule per se because it uses a different, pandemic-contingent standard: the taxpayer continues to have Massachusetts income tax liability if they worked out of Massachusetts prior to the pandemic and are now working remotely from another state. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 11:01 am
Our phased reopening in conditions where case incidence remains high ensures a long and slow recovery, not a V-shaped recovery. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 2:55 am
By FY 2018, Connecticut homeowners paid an effective rate of 1.70 percent on the fair market value of their property, compared to 1.11 percent nationwide and 1.15, 1.40, and 1.53 percent respectively in Massachusetts, New York, and Rhode Island. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 1:05 pm
Other states, such as Rhode Island, exempt most lenders and creditors from UDAP coverage.[2] By way of example, Massachusetts’ UDAP statute, known as “Chapter 93A” broadly prohibits “unfair methods of competition and unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the conduct of any trade or commerce. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 10:26 am
The Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Murphy v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 11:12 am
” Gunn v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 10:29 am
People v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 5:25 pm
New York, Maine, Virginia, the District of Columbia, Vermont, New Jersey, Connecticut, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Illinois (in part), Delaware, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, North Carolina (in part) and Ohio (1) have a significant number of [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 8:08 am
After the Confederation, Congress sent the proposed Constitution to the states for ratification, and each state legislature (although Rhode Island only belatedly) arranged for the election of delegates to that state’s ratifying convention. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 12:36 pm
Leaving aside the issue of whether BAP opinions have any precedential value to start with, the Bullard case essentially terminated the use of hybrid plans in Massachusetts, Maine, New Hampshire, and Rhode Island. [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 6:48 am
Moreover, the conservatives on the Court can rub the language of Massachusetts v. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 9:40 am
McBride v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 9:21 am
Delaware, Rhode Island, and Pennsylvania are the other states with uncommonly high rates. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 4:32 pm
[v] Iowa Code § 91D.1(2). [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 12:12 pm
Following in the footsteps of its neighbors Maine, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire, Rhode Island recently enacted legislation that restricts the use of non-competition agreements with certain types of employees. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 4:17 am
Act. 6993, Delaware Chancery Court (Mar. 30, 2012) at 12; Brief of Amici Curiae Attorneys General for the Commonwealths of Kentucky, Massachusetts, and Pennsylvania, the States of Arizona, Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South… [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 7:30 am
In ruling for the plaintiff in the Palmiter case, Judge Nealon followed the trend of judges in Delaware, Rhode Island, New Jersey, Connecticut, Massachusetts and Arizona, all of whom have ruled in favor of patients/employees certified under state law to use medical marijuana. [read post]
