Search for: "McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green"
Results 41 - 60
of 92
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2019, 6:40 am
She can do so in a variety of ways, one of which is by navigating the familiar burden-shifting framework established by the Supreme Court in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 3:30 am
The Eleventh Circuit noted that a plaintiff who brings intentional-discrimination claims has several options available to her: [O]ne of which is by navigating the now-familiar three-part burden-shifting framework established by the Supreme Court in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 7:48 am
She can do so in a variety of ways, one of which is by navigating the now-familiar three-part burden-shifting framework established by the Supreme Court in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 3:21 pm
” The Tenth Circuit noted that some sister circuits have disagreed, but opined that those courts reached the wrong conclusion based on an erroneous interpretation of the burden-shifting framework set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 8:28 pm
Hernandez, 540 U.S. 44, 49 (2003) (citing McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 7:13 am
Next, the Court conducts the three-part burden shifting analysis developed in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 7:13 am
Next, the Court conducts the three-part burden shifting analysis developed in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 7:13 am
Next, the Court conducts the three-part burden shifting analysis developed in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 12:43 pm
Under the “burden-shifting framework” of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 6:30 am
En los casos por discrimen en la jurisdicción federal es aplicable la doctrina que se conoce como el “McDonnell Douglas paradigm”, establecido por el Tribunal Supremo de los Estados Unidos en McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 9:29 am
A judge or jury must then decide what the real reason for the firing was.The Supreme Court laid out the framework for adjudicating such cases in its 1973 ruling in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 11:54 am
It upheld the lower court decision.The dissent, written by Judge Servitto, referred to a US Supreme Court case McDonnell Douglas Corp v Green, 411 US 792, as a framework for evaluating age-discrimination claims. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 8:11 am
This McDonnell Douglas test, named for the case of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 6:11 pm
Though lacking direct evidence, the Complainant successfully set forth a prima facie case of gender-based discrimination under the three-stage burden-shifting framework set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 3:30 am
” Does this mean that we can forget about shifting burdens of proof, as in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 3:30 am
” Does this mean that we can forget about shifting burdens of proof, as in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 4:39 am
The burden-shifting framework created by McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 4:39 am
The burden-shifting framework created by McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 6:30 am
"Parker said Young modified burden-shifting framework in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 11:11 am
The trial court analyzed those arguments under the standard created by a 1973 US Supreme Court case, McDonnell Douglas v. [read post]
